Antisemite hate pictures. From Swedish “Christian” education company Bilda and Ahmadinejad.

We well rememer the competition Ahmadinejad arranged about the “best” hate cartoon about the Holocaust, one of th well known gimmick of Ahmadinejad, lthe winning cartoons at http://www.irancartoon.com/120/holocaust/  

Bilda recently had an exhibition of these antisemite hate pictures in  Immanuelskyrkan in Stockholm, belonging to Svenska Missionskyrkan. My grandfather was a member there 100 years ago and is for sure rotating in his grave. A co-blogger coined the term Jihad Christians for this kind of “christians”.

Anna Ekström writes about the Bilda hate show here in Swedish with some explanations about the event. An article in English was before in Ha’aretz but it has automatically disappeared, there is one, maybe the same here. Also in Jerusalem Post.

 

Here I have mixed pictures from both Bilda and Ahmadinejad, and at least I do not see any difference in “degree of antisemitism” between the two. Not a good feeling to be a Swede nowadays.

Earlier article, in Swedish, at http://israelisverige.info/?p=11438

.......

In most browsers you can click on a picture to adapt it better to your screen.

 

Bilda had to remove the antisemite exhibition earlier than planned

 

 Compare with this picture.

No, the color part is not the mosque al Aqsa, that is rather ugly and witnoug imagination built on top of a byzantine Church that the muslims destroyed, but of the far more elegant Dome of the Rock, which is not a mosque.The black hat is of course a symbol for all Jews. If you want to see genuine muslim culture, go to YouTube and search for Cairo belly dance or similar.

 

 

 

 

 

 Observe the word on the front, Bible. “Christian” artists do not consider the Bible having anything to do with modern Christianity. I can only agree.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Jews = money. As we know no Arabs have money.

 

 

To swear in the church is ok nowadays  as long as you swear over Jews No Star of David on the flag as you see. No hint that the terror barrier is there because of terror. Not a hint that Israel has promised to take it down when the terror stops.

 

 

 Josef, Maria, jesus as “palestinians”.

 

 

 

 

Environment or heritage?

There is a debate going on just now – a “palestinian” Swedish-born girl, around 20, that is supposed to be a speaker at the Eurovision Festival for Sweden, has been found with a blog with very blatant anti-semitism and Israel hatred. So what is environment and what is heritage? Her looks – well, the brown eyes probably inherited, the rest is the environment I guess.

As you know, UNRWA decided 60 years ago that “palestinians” can never become anything else, especially “palestinian refugees” and their grandchildren can not be anything else. She cannot be Swedish, she cannot call herself Arabic as Arafat i 1967 decided it is unsuitable that Arabs under his control call themselves Arabs as nobody feels pity for a group of  500.000.000 people, while a few million is less than the number of Jews they live close to, making that group small enough to feel pity for. He got the idea of calling them “palestinians” even thou the word mostly had been used, up to then, for Jews in the Palestinian Mandate.

Suddenly she climed in fame when it was publicly revealed that she had written things like comparing the Israeli government with Hitler – where it was obvious who she favoured.

Recently she wrote, according to one article:  ”Couldn’t Israel pop up some camps where they gas every palestinian? Then they have got what they wanted.”

I reminded in some comment: here are the camps:

  1. 1.170.000 million mostly grandchildren of refugees
  2. 496.000
  3. 2.000.000
  4. 455.000
  5. 688.700

Only that it is Arabs keeping Arabs in dirty camps! Jews never put Arabs in camps, but there were MORE Jewish refugees from Arab lands than the number of Arabs who left Israel, most of them fleeing to Israel.  The incoming Jews sat in camps a few weeks while place was made for them to be absorbed. Israel tried to help the Arab refugees in Gaza to move to villages and become non-refugees – both PLO and UN got furious! PLO promised to murder every Arab who accepted the offer.

So – what does these thoughts reveal about Gina Dirawis mental state, is it inherited or depending on environment? Is she “palestinian” or Swedish in her mind?

One of the project leaders says: “Ah well, it is her way to express her anti violence, and we accept that” . . . . . . . .

Some Swedish articles about the mess – use Google if you cannot read it fluently:

Her blog:

http://anagina.blogg.se/

Newspaper articles:

http://nyheter24.se/noje/kandisar/625312-svt-splittrade-efter-ana-ginas-attack

http://nyheter24.se/noje/kandisar/624543-svt-s-hemliga-krav-pa-ana-gina

http://www.newsmill.se/artikel/2011/11/01/melodifestivalens-programledare-m-ste-ta-avst-nd-fr-n-antisemitism

http://www.newsmill.se/artikel/2011/11/04/svts-tidigare-mellan-sternkorre-j-mf-r-israel-med-nazityskland#comment-311949

So – the main question remains: from where does a “palestinian” successful girl in Sweden get her political information and what does she think she will win with exposing that? Because it HAS made her blog well known. Does she not have the tiniest clue of what big a part of her modern life hs been generated in Israel or does she not care and tries to fool other Swedes? The first chat program came from four young guys in Tel Aviv, not Ramallah. Most hi-tech big American companies have development labs in Israel, not with the palestinians. Of course some try, like the company Cisco that tries to engage also the palestinians. Of course – Abbas works hard to break that connection to Israel. As hard as he tries to break the Oslo Agreements, and he does not care what he and his people lose on it. He does not care that he gets much of his drinking water from Israel – as long as the Oslo Agreement stands. He does not care that millions of people will suffer because now thanks to him, UNESCO has not money enough for their planned projects. We remember when IMF said the palestinians had a working economy – IF they keep good relation to Israel, not otherwise.

And Miss Gina Dirawi does not care a whit. She is happy she has got a price from a weekly magazine, Veckorevyn, for “the funniest blog 2010″. How well did they read that blog?

I can only speulate what the papers had written if she were Jewish and had spit out the same things about palestinians or arabs.

Swedish politics is a lost case. Even parties that seem kinda sensible do not accept the Oslo Accords, where palestinians control area A, B IF THEY STOP TERROR AND INCITEMENT against Israel/Jews. In 18 years they have done neither, after all they see they get more donations from the rest of the world, than anybody else, by being just as they are. CIA World Factbook lists approximately 60 other countries/areas poorer than the palestinians. Sweden gives immense amounts of money to them, never asking them to fulfill any promises.  In Oslo Israel got the same control over area C, but that is NOT accepted by those Swedish parties!

So in this environment, crystal clear antisemitism is not a hindrance to make a career while we remember a few years ago, a  man working in the Migration Bureau and having a pro-Israeli blog, was kicked out by his boss! Even when the case came to court and he won, the Migration Bureau refused to accept it and hire him again……..

The debate has boiled down to the behaviour of the media, like the only politically correct behaviour in Sweden is to be anti-Israel pro-palestinian. The bosses of the girl at Swedish Radio/TV are squiggling to try to explain how nice she really is, that she only has good intentions with what she writes.

To talk about Swedish media – an interview was mentioned on Facebook with another Swedish “Middle East specialist” a few years ago who for a long time worked at DN, our biggest daily paper, and now after retirement they continue to buy her material, Lotta Schüllerqvist. It goes like this:

Notes taken during a meeting with her, arranged by the Society Sweden-Israel October 1, 2007 in the Jewish center in Stockholm.

First
- Why are you never reporting about the constant rocket fire from Gaza?

“It seems not to be my job” [sic!]

Second
- Do you read at some point what others write about the conflict, such as foreign journalists?

- “No, why would I do that?”

Third
- Do you have any idea how many “at home” stories you has done for Jewish families who lost relatives in terrorist acts compared to interviews with Arabic families who lost family members in the war?

I do not know, I have not counted, no idea.

4th
(The politruk Schüllerqvist says that Gaza has become a dangerous place to travel in and she, if she needs to go to a different location, will now always take taxis “from door to door”.)

- You say that Gaza has become a dangerous place, but just recently in DN it was argued that in Gaza it had become very quiet after the Hamas takeover. How does that work?

- “Are you saying thaaaat …?
Yes, I believe it has become dangerous only to journalists, not Gazans.”

The second paper, Svenska Dagbladet, has a similar figure, Bitte Hammargren, Unfortunately the Swedish News agency, TT, is penetrated by the same antisemite spirit. Before it circulated around one person there, Stefan Hjertén, who was the well known antisemite there, but they have retained the same bias after his retirement. Often they state that they have got the news from e.g. Reuters, but if you compare what TT and what Reuters have written about the same thing, it is easy to see where TT has added and subtracted and twisted and put in their favourite keywords.

Back to the original question that I can not answer. I do not know a thing about that girl’s family background or other experiences, from the half dozen, maybe, articles I have seen about her, so I have not a clue if her hatred for Israel is because of environment or heritage.

I only just heard that  her grandfather, Chaher Dirawi, was imam in the sunni cellar mosque at the Islamic Culture Center in Sundsvall, Sweden, a mosque with the sexes fully separated. It WOULD be a pity with a honor killing, right.

 

Bloggar: BitteAssarmo, SapereAude, Namanula, Pophöger,  Avpixlat, Autonaomi,

http://www.expressen.se/noje/1.2610199/svt-laxar-upp-gina-dirawi-for-blogginlagg

 

 

http://www.gp.se/kulturnoje/1.762146-gina-dirawi-leder-melodifestivalen

http://blog.svd.se/ledarbloggen/2011/11/02/den-opolitiska-melodifestivalen/

http://blog.svd.se/kultur/2011/10/31/gina-dirawi-leder-melodifestivalen/

 

http://www.aftonbladet.se/nojesbladet/melodifestivalen2011/article13863181.ab

 

http://www.svd.se/opinion/brannpunkt/fel-att-anklaga-gina-dirawi-for-antisemitism_6611672.svd

 

 

            ......

Fateh Constitution

Just a reminder for those who still got the idea that Abbas is a “moderate”. This is his written Constitution. They had a new meeting where they wrote a new one, but included was that “the old constitution is still valid”, and the new one talks about more practical and less fundamental things:

 

FATEH Constitution

http://www.fateh.net/e_public/constitution.htm. As of July 19 2005    [does not exist anymore]

Chapter One
Principles… Goals…. Methods
The Movement’s Essential Principles

Article (1) Palestine is part of the Arab World, and the Palestinian people are part of the Arab Nation, and their struggle is part of its struggle.

Article (2) The Palestinian people have an independent identity. They are the sole authority that decides their own destiny, and they have complete sovereignty on all their lands.

Article (3) The Palestinian Revolution plays a leading role in liberating Palestine .

Article (4) The Palestinian struggle is part and parcel of the world-wide struggle against Zionism, colonialism and international imperialism.

Article (5) Liberating Palestine is a national obligation which necessities the materialistic and human support of the Arab Nation.

Article (6) UN projects, accords and reso, or those of any individual cowhich undermine the Palestinian people’s right in their homeland are illegal and rejected.

Article (7) The Zionist Movement is racial, colonial and aggressive in ideology, goals, organisation and method.

Article (8) The Israeli existence in Palestine is a Zionist invasion with a colonial expansive base, and it is a natural ally to colonialism and international imperialism.

Article (9) Liberating Palestine and protecting its holy places is an Arab, religious and human obligation.

Article (10) Palestinian National Liberation Movement, “FATEH”, is an independent national revolutionary movement representing the revolutionary vanguard of the Palestinian people.

Article (11) The crowds which participate in the revolution and liberation are the proprietors of the Palestinian land.

Goals

Article (12) Complete liberation of Palestine , and eradication of Zionist economic, political, military and cultural existence.

Article (13) Establishing an independent democratic state with complete sovereignty on all Palestinian lands, and Jerusalem is its capital city, and protecting the citizens’ legal and equal rights without any racial or religious discrimination.

Article (14) Setting up a progressive society that warrants people’s rights and their public freedom.

Article (15) Active participation in achieving the Arab Nation’s goals in liberation and building an independent, progressive and united Arab society.

Article (16) Backing up all oppressed people in their struggle for liberation and self determination in order to build a just, international peace.

Method

Article (17) Armed public revolution is the inevitable method to liberating Palestine .

Article (18) Entire dependence on the Palestinian people which is the pedestal forefront and on the Arab Nation as a partner in the fight, and realising actual interaction between the Arab Nation and the Palestinian people by involving the Arab people in the fight through a united Arab front.

Article (19) Armed struggle is a strategy and not a tactic, and the Palestinian Arab People’s armed revolution is a decisive factor in the liberation fight and in uprooting the Zionist existence, and this struggle will not cease unless the Zionist state is demolished and Palestine is completely liberated.

Article (20) Achieving mutual understanding with all the national forces participating in the armed struggle to attain the national unity.

Article (21) Revealing the revolutionary nature of the Palestinian identity at the international level, and this does not contradict the everlasting unity between the Arab Nation and the Palestinian people.

Article (22) Opposing any political solution offered as an alternative to demolishing the Zionist occupation in Palestine, as well as any project intended to liquidate the Palestinian case or impose any international mandate on its people.

Article (23) Maintaining relations with Arab countries with the objective of developing the positive aspects in their attitudes with the proviso that the armed struggle is not negatively affected.

Article (24) Maintaining relations with all liberal forces supporting our just struggle in order to resist together Zionism and imperialism.

Article (25) Convincing concerned countries in the world to prevent Jewish immigration to Palestine as a method of solving the problem.

Article (26) Avoiding attempts to exploit the Palestinian case in any Arab or international problems and considering the case above all contentions.

Article (27) “FATEH” does not interfere with local Arab affairs and hence, does not tolerate such interference or obstructing its struggle by any party.

.....< href="http://nyligen.se/blogg/nk80eb">..

Guide for the Perplexed

Guide for the Perplexed

Posted By Dr. Yasser Dasmabebi On October 26, 2011 @ 12:00 am In Daily Mailer

 

I have come to realize just how difficult it may be to decipher news about the Middle East, Islam, Israel, the Arab World, and all these powerful and explosive issues of our times for those who rely on such media stalwarts as The New York TimesThe Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, the major television networks, cable news, etc. for their information. For example, how is a person to ascertain whether the slayer of a family is a terrorist or a militant or a gunman or an assailant or an activist or a freedom-fighter?

So, purely as a public service, I have organized the following glossary of the most pertinent terms and expressions, as typically used in the above-mentioned news sources. I hope, insha’allah, the reader will find it helpful to unravel the Gordian Knot of language that is today’s (and yesterday’s and tomorrow’s) Middle East!

Dr. Yasser Dasmabebi holds the Edward Said-Noam Chomsky Linguistics Chair at Abdul Abulbul Amir University in Cairo.

 

************************************

Aggression: Killing people who are trying to kill you.

Al Qaeda: the terrorist group that, according to American security sources, embodies the world-wide Islamist movement, and that is either “significantly degraded” or is still “extremely dangerous,” depending on which government official is doing the talking.

Apartheid:  The political/social system of the one and only country in the Middle East that integrates Jews, Beduins, Arabs, whites, blacks, Muslems, Ethiopians, Russians, Christians, Greek Orthodox, Russian Orthodox, Bahai, et al.

“Apes & Pigs”: See “Jew” below.

Arab Emir: Military dictator.

Arab King: Military dictator.

Arab President: Military dictator.

Arab Prime Minister: Military dictator.

Arab Spring: Replacement of one dictatorship with another, with the help of Western money and media cheerleading.

Arab Street: Enraged mobs chanting and screaming their hatred, determined to annihilate Israel and the Jews. They can often be seen burning American and Israeli flags, passing out candies and firing guns into the air in response to successful murders of Westerners (closely related to):

Arab Humiliation: The pervasive feeling on the Arab street generated by their failure to annihilate Israel and the Jews in several wars. Many opinion-makers, Middle East experts and op-ed writers argue that Arab humiliation is at the root of the Middle East conflict; i.e., “If only the Jews would let themselves be destroyed, the Arab street would feel better about themselves, and then there would be peace.”

Ayatola: Persian dictator. Spiritual leader of that faith that desires to ignite nuclear holocaust in order to bring about the arrival of the Mahdi. (See “Mahdi” below.)

Bias: An expression of support for the existence of Israel.

Caliphate: The unification of lands ruled in the name of Islam, ruled by a Caliph. (See “Arab King,” “Arab President,” etc. above.)

Compromise: To give something palpable, such as land, in return for a promise not to keep on trying to annihilate you.

Developing Country: A country that is not developing.

Disproportionate Response: Winning.

Diversity: The condition in which all cultures are viewed as equally and inherently virtuous, except for the culture of the West, which is viewed as evil by virtue of imperialism, colonialism and endemic racism (see “Racist” below).

Emergency Laws: The law.

Father of the Palestinian People: An Egyptian man, raised by his uncle, Hitler’s buddy, and one of the world’s most successful kleptocrats. (See “PLO” below.)

Fatwa: A pronouncement of a mullah that sanctions murder, but only of disagreeable people, like inadequately covered women, Salman Rushdie, etc.

Female Genital Mutilation: That ritual of which Western feminist organizations seem, by virtue of their silence, to approve.

Hamas: The democratically elected government of Gaza whose founding charter calls for genocide.

Hezbollah: The democratic group whose purpose is saving Lebanon from Israeli aggression, and whose founding charter calls for genocide.

History: Having nothing whatsoever to do with what has actually happened, but rather being what has come to be called “narrative,” i.e., “storytelling.” For one example, allusions to the “Ancient Nation of Palestine;” and for another, almost all the Muslem accomplishments President Obama enumerated in his momentous Cairo speech (also see “Rewriting History” below).

Holocaust: That genocide that did not happen, but that the Jews orchestrated in order to steal Arab land, and that of which the Jewish presence in Palestine is worse than.

Honor Killings: The cultural imperative to murder one’s daughter/sister/niece for humiliating male members…(see “Shariah” below).

Human Rights: The credo by which murder committed by a person from a country which used to be called “Third World” (now considered racist terminology) is good (see “Resistance” below); retaliatory killing by a person who is either from a developed country, a white person or most especially a Jew, is bad (see “Agression” above).

Human Shields: Integral part of Hamas & Hezbollah military strategy.

Islamic Republic: Military dictatorship.

Israel: Occupied territory (see “Zionist Entity” below).

Israeli Prime Minister: Hawkish, right-winger, hard-liner.

Jerusalem: City holy to Islam in which the Jews have no history.

Jew: The source of all decadence and evil in the world; descendent of apes and pigs.

Jihad: The inner spiritual struggle for self-purification or the bloody military struggle for world domination depending on to which journalist and in what language one is speaking.

Judeo-Christian Values: The credo of that civilization which has lost all its values, except for that racism is bad, and diversity is good.

Koran: The book that was revealed word-for-word to the Prophet Muhammed (Peace Be Upon Him) by the Angel Gabriel…or not.

Leftist: Supporter of PLO (see “PLO” below) and Hamas (see “Hamas” above) and Muslem Brotherhood (see “Muslem Brotherhood” below).

Mahdi: The Shia Messiah who has been hiding for centuries at the bottom of a well.

Martyr: Someone who kills someone else while killing himself, said to be rewarded for his martyrdom by the acquisition of 72 virgins upon his arrival in Paradise, at least according to what the Prophet  Muhammed (Peace Be Upon Him) said the Angel Gabriel told him (see “Koran” above).

Militant, Assailant, Gunman, Activist: terrorist.

Moderate Palestinian Leader: Former KGB operative, Holocaust denier, and financier of Munich Olympic massacre.

Mosque: A place for the storage of armaments.

Muslem Brotherhood: A mostly secular and non-violent political party in Egypt.

Occupation: Jewish presence in disputed territory. (See “Israel” above.)

Peace: War of attrition.

Peace Process: The dismantling of Israel.

Peace Talks: The avoidance of peace.

PLO: Organization created in 1964 to end the 1967 occupation.

Palestinian Authority: The world’s most successful kleptocracy.

Palestinian Hero: Murderer of children.

Palestinian Prime Minister: Moderate, bold (see “Arab Prime Minister” above).

Protocols of the Elders of Zion: The authentic Jewish playbook for world domination.

Racist: A person who disagrees with or does not like or does not support the reelection of President Obama.

Radical Islamic Movement: A group whose stated official goal is genocide (see “Hamas” and “Hezbollah” above).

Recognition: A truce until the next time.

Refugee: Someone who has refused to take refuge, or who has not been allowed to take refuge.

“Religion of Peace”: That civilization with which the Judeo-Christian civilization is locked in a war to the death.

Resistance: Randomly killing civilians, especially children.

Rewriting History: See “History” above.

Right: Demand to live in Israel by people who hate it and wish to destroy it.

of Return: By people very, very few of whom have ever actually been there.

Settlement: An illegal community made up of settlers. (See “Settler” below.)

Settler: Someone who builds his house in order to thwart any chance at making peace between Jews and Palestinians.

Shariah: The Islamic system of jurisprudence which codifies and dignifies rape, child marriage, specific classes of murder such as honor killings (see “Honor Killings” above), etc.

Shia: People who are certain that Sunnis are not real Muslems, and are in fact infidels, and should therefore be slaughtered.

Sunni: People who are certain that Shia are not real Muslems, and are in fact infidels, and should therefore be slaughtered.

War Crime: Retaliation and defense. Any action whose intent is victory.

War on Terror: Pretense that the enemy of the West is made up of small, shadowy groups motivated by childhood poverty (see “Al Qaeda” above). (“We’re depraved on account of we’re deprived” — apologies to S. Sondheim.)

Zionism: The ideology of the Jews who aspire to control, dominate and take over the world.

Zionist: Someone who is worse than a Nazi.

Zionist Entity: That place that does not exist, as on Arab maps, but that must be destroyed.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle. Click here.

.....

Spengler, lately revealed as David P. Goldman

Spengler was a discovery I made a number of years ago, in Asia Times in Hong Kong. Some months ago he also started to write in Pajamas Media. His articles about many things – but a sizable part is about the Middle East and the dying islamic world.

The Danish Snaphanen wrote about his new book:

 

SENESTE OPDATERING: 26/10-11 KL. 1346

Vi har mange gange henvist til David P. Goldmans artikler i Asia Times og på Pajamas Media. Nu træder han frem i fuld figur med en bog, der anmeldes her og følges af et interview. Såvidt ses, findes der ikke andre endnu, ligesom der heller ikke findes TV og radioptrædener, men bogen kommer givetvis til at få mange andre anmeldelser, måske endda i Danmark:

[..] Islamic culture, Goldman states, has been singularly unsuccessful during the past seven centuries. The Muslim world, according to the author, suffers from a greater loss of traditional values and culture among the young generation where drug addiction and prostitution are more endemic than in Western nations. Furthermore, modern Islam does not promote success in science, art, philosophy or democracy, those institutions which sustain civilization and culture.

For Goldman, “nothing less than the transformation of Islam from a state religion to a personal religion is required for the Arabs to enter the modern world.” Goldman is skeptical and derisive of the efforts to export democracy to the Arab world. Events in Iraq, Afghanistan, and now Libya, certainly bear out his theory.[..]

And then the article continues with the interview mentioned in the article that follows here.

 

 

October 26, 2011

“How Civilizations Die (And Why Islam Is Dying Too)” by David P. Goldman

Review and Interview

Ruth King


 

Demographic predictions often affect national security policy. President Jimmy Carter’s smarter brother Billy put it succinctly. When questioned about his shady deals with Libya, he replied “The only thing I can say is there is a hell of a lot more Arabians than there is Jews.” American policy with respect to the Middle East has been stated a tad more elegantly but it is based on the same immoral and obtuse calculations.

 

With respect to Israel, misleading predictions of Arab population growth were used, mostly by soft-core supporters to suggest that Jews were doomed to become a minority west of the Jordan River and should concede that geography in order to secure demography. A study : “The million Person Gap: The Arab Population in theWest Bank and Gaza-the American-Israel Demographic Research Group” was published by the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies in February 2006  with Ambassador (Ret.) Yoram Ettinger  as head of the Israeli team. All the meticulous research, including birth and death records and emigration numbers, revealed a net loss of Arab births and a surge in Jewish births in the West Bank.

 

As Ambassador Ettinger stated: “the demographic time bomb became a demographic scare crow.”

 

Today’s demographic scare crow evokes resurgent Islam, growing by leaps and bounds – invincible and inevitable and never to be challenged or offended.

 

David P. Goldman is a columnist and editor who writes a weekly essay on Western culture, economics, and politics under the very apposite pseudonym “Spengler.” In his book “How Civilizations Die (And Why Islam is Dying Too)” he shreds this current “demographobia” with documentation, statistics, analysis and hard facts.

 

He gets right to the task in the first chapter:” The Closing of the Muslim Womb” with the disclosure that “The Muslim world is on the brink of the fastest population decline in recorded history.” The media, particularly during the period of Arab uprisings has shown hundreds of thousands of Muslims in their mid- twenties.  However, this generation of people who grew up with six or seven siblings opts for smaller families and does not reproduce, while the graying population grows less productive and more dependent as food production dwindles – a prescription for economic collapse. The Moslem world is not alone in this scenario. Europe, both Western and Eastern face similar falling population rates and the same consequences. Goldman predicts that by the end of this century population collapse will affect the entire industrial world.

 

Islamic culture, Goldman states, has been singularly unsuccessful during the past seven centuries. The Muslim world, according to the author, suffers from a greater loss of traditional values and culture among the young generation where drug addiction and prostitution are more endemic than in Western nations. Furthermore, modern Islam does not promote success in science, art, philosophy or democracy, those institutions which sustain civilization and culture.

 

For Goldman, “nothing less than the transformation of Islam from a state religion to a personal religion is required for the Arabs to enter the modern world.” Goldman is skeptical and derisive of the efforts to export democracy to the Arab world. Events in Iraq, Afghanistan, and now Libya, certainly bear out his theory.

 

For the United States, India and China, Goldman predicts a more cautiously optimistic scenario. American exceptionalism, resilient religion, higher birth rates, immigration and increased innovation and productivity will spare the United States. Furthermore, America is the only nation capable of maintaining its national character in spite of all the multi-cultural and hyphenated ethnic identities which challenge national pride and culture.

 

Herbert Spencer wrote in 1864 in “The Principles of Biology”: “The survival of the fittest, implies multiplication of the fittest.” David Goldman demonstrates how and why the fittest civilizations survived and how population growth made them fit while others crumbled.

 

This book is a tour de force with enough original data and analysis of history, religion, economics, philosophy  and demography to cross a reader’s eyes, to paraphrase Sholem Aleichem’s Tevye.  It is an invaluable asset for all who are interested in history, national security and national destiny.

 

It is a great pleasure to interview David.P. Goldman.

 

 

RK:  Tell us about your pseudonym “Spengler.”

DG:  When I began these essays in 2000, I was a managing director at Credit Suisse, and the controversial approach didn’t square with a Wall Street job—so I hid behind a pseudonym. The choice of name was a joke: an essayist for the Asia Times using the name of the author of “The Decline of the West.” Oswald Spengler, to be sure, was a nasty piece of work.

RK:  How do you explain the survival of Judaism? One of every three Jews in the world perished during the Holocaust, yet Jews and Israel remain vibrant, productive and even influential in politics.

DG:  One can argue that modernity began at Mount Sinai. Success in the modern world is a bottom-up phenomenon. It depends on empowering individuals. And the idea of a covenant through which every Jew stands in direct relation to the creator of heaven and earth is the source of our modern idea of individual empowerment—what the Declaration of Independence calls “inalienable rights.” And the Jewish idea that we approach God through Torah learning has fostered extraordinary thinkers in every generation. But at a deeper level, I can’t explain it. Israel seems a miracle to me. Rabbi Haskel Lookstein once quoted his teacher, the great Joseph Soloveichik, saying that God helped us establish the State of Israel in this generation not because of our merit, but because after the Holocaust the Jewish people was so beaten down that without such a miracle, we might have disappeared. Sadly, large parts of Judaism continue to decline. I mention in my book that Reform and secular Jews have the lowest fertility rate of any identifiable part of the American population. They average one child per woman, and half of those children intermarry. On the other hand, Modern Orthodoxy is flourishing, in a way few would have predicted a generation ago. But the Israelis are an inspiration. It must be that Jews flourish in their own country. They have the best demographics of any OECD country—three children per woman—and are a pocket superpower in science and the arts.

RK:  It may be somewhat soothing to know that there is no Islamic population “time bomb” but what can one make of Islam and Sharia law which are encroaching on all our academic, legal and cultural institutions?

DG: There are some places where the Islamic population time bomb is a real threat, for example, the United Kingdom. Pakistan is the main source of Muslim immigration, and as I note in the book, Pakistan still has extremely high birth rates. That stems from the country’s backwardness—half of Pakistanis can’t read. And the Pakistanis who move to Britain keep their high birth rates. That may be why we see the most outrageous concessions to Sharia in the UK. Muslims in America remain too small a minority to impose Sharia, but we have to be vigilant, or we will end up like what Melanie Phillips calls “Londonistan.”

RK:  What about Europe on the brink of becoming “Eurabia?”

DG:  In some cases, Muslims are just a generation behind Europeans in the demographic spiral downwards. The Turk s who move to Germany tend to become Europeanized fairly quickly; in fact, Turkey, after Iran, faces the biggest demographic bust in the Muslim world. In other cases, especially the UK, Islamicization through higher birth rates is a real threat. It may be that both the European and Muslim populations decline, and parts of Europe end up populated by other people: Latin Americans in the case of Spain, or Africans in the case of Italy. The biggest risk to Europe in the immediate future is the prospect of hungry Arabs fleeing the economic collapse of Egypt.

RK:  Explain the nexus between population collapse and Muslim terrorism and why you think the collapse may actually encourage an increase in terrorism.

DG:  It hasn’t gone unnoticed by the likes of Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad or Turkey’s Tayyip Erdogan that at current fertility rates, Iran and Turkey respectively will collapse in a generation or so. Erdogan warned in public that Turkey will cease to exist as a nation by 2038—why he chose that year is unclear to me, but it corresponds to what we read in the UN demographic tables. That feeds into their apocalyptic sense of urgency. Iran sees itself as the center of a great recovery of Sh’ia Islam, and Turkey sees itself as the pillar of a new Ottoman Empire. But given their demographics, they have one generation in which to stake their claim. Ahmadinejad and Erdogan recall Adolf Hitler, who thought that the deterioration of the Aryan race was so far advanced that Germany had only one last chance to assert itself. With that sense of historical pessimism, Hitler was willing to stake everything on one roll of the dice. And a country that despairs of its future is capable of unspeakable acts. If Iran obtains nuclear weapons, we should not be surprised if they are detonated in American cities.

RK:  You are more optimistic about the American future. You have a background in finance. Our economy is in free fall. How do you think it can be halted?

DG:  The US is the only industrial country that will have more people of working age in 2050 than today. That by itself gives us a huge advantage. History belongs to people who turn up for it. We have some important strengths in the US economy. The biggest surprise to me during the past two years is how well some our big corporations have done. They’ve increased sales, employment and profits while most of the economy languishes. That, I believe, is because the big companies are better prepared to withstand the miserable policy environment created by our dreadful administration. If we get a Republican in the White House and 2013, cut taxes on capital and roll back regulation, we’ll see a substantial improvement.

RK:  What are your thoughts on Libya? What are your thoughts generally on the “Arab Spring.?”

DG:  After Lockerbie, no-one should feel sorry for Qaddafi. But we have turned loose hard-core jihadists against Qaddafi, and they in turn will become a problem. If we adopt the premise that we will continue to sponsor opposition against regimes that are hostile to us, the outcome could be good. If we don’t like the regime that replaces Qaddafi, we should bring it down as well, and the next one, and the one after that. The Arab Spring is not a harbinger of democracy in the Muslim world: it is the convulsion of a dying society. After sixty years of military rule, Egypt has three-fifths of its population on the land, but still imports half its caloric consumption. It has 45% illiteracy, and massive disguised unemployment in the form of universities whose graduates are unemployable except by the government bureaucracy. To expect this basket case to produce  a democracy under conditions of extreme economic stress seems delusional to me. We are watching the breakdown of dysfunctional societies: hunger and social unrest in Egypt, civil war in Syria and Yemen.

RK:  Is Tunisia an exception in the Arab/Moslem world?

DG:  Tunisia has a very small population and a better educated population, and among all the “Arab Spring” countries, has the highest chance of success, although I consider the chance slim. It appears that Islamist parties will govern Tunisia after this week’s elections, and we won’t like the result.  Longer term, Tunisia has catastrophic demographics. Its population of young people will fall by half by mid-century at current fertility rates. And 40% of the population will be elderly dependents. That is a formula for utter economic breakdown in a poor country.

RK:  Some predict an American renaissance if we gain energy independence. Your thoughts?

DG:  Energy independence is a worthy endeavor but it’s not enough. The growth opportunities in the world economy are in emerging markets, where billions of people are moving out of rural poverty into urban prosperity. It’s the greatest wave of economic advancement in world history, by an order of magnitude. American corporations that export things that support this wave—Caterpillar and Dupont, for example—will do well. But our base of skills and industrial capacity is too narrow. There’s a serious labor shortage of programmers, engineers, and skilled workers even in in this weak economy. In my view we need fiscal incentives for capital investment, an immigration policy that favors qualified people, and a break in the education monopoly so that we can train the people we need.

RK:  You speak of faith and fertility as tied to survival. Are you observant? Do you have children?

DG:  Yes. I am observant although it was a long journey for me to observance. I came from a secular family and first joined a synagogue twenty years ago. I keep kosher and observe the Sabbath and pray every day and holiday accroding to Jewish practice. And, I have two beautiful daughters.  

RK: Many thanks for your time and your wonderful book and best wishes for continuing success.

DGAnd many thanks to you Ruth, for your insight and encouragement.

FamilySecurityMatters.org Contributing Editor Ruth S. King is a freelance writer who writes a monthly column in OUTPOST, the publication of Americans for a Safe Israel.

.....

Julia Cæsar in English: Population exchange.

Sunday Chronicle: Population Exchanges

Latest update: 1/10-11 KL. 0754

By Julia Cæsar

Copyright Julia Cæsar, Snaphanen,

 

The Swedish government is to change the population of Sweden. Since the center-right alliance government came to power in 2006, the pace of immigration hit new records. Immigration of hard-to- integrate people from Muslim countries in Africa and the Middle East has almost doubled. The number of foreign born is now increasing 12.5 times more than the Swedish born population. If immigration continues at the same rate as the last fourteen years the Swedes will be in the minority in the largest Swedish cities around 2050. All signs indicate that immigration policy has gone overboard and that the politicians have lost control. It is not common sense that governs Sweden. A total don’t-touch anxiety about immigration policy has resulted in mass exodus from political accountability. Sand box prestige and Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt (m), paranoid hatred against a democratically elected parliamentary party, the Sweden Democrats, is allowed to govern an entire country’s policies.

The conservative alliance government did not say anything before the 2006 election that they would step up immigration to extreme levels, that is even more extreme than the Social Democratic government had succeeded with. That the Swedish immigration policy is extreme in comparison with any other countries is well known, and probably many voters voted for the Conservatives in the hope of a limitation of immigration. It became the opposite. Looking back five years later, the Moderate Party, Centre Party, Liberals and Christian Democrats turned out to be true immigration extremists. During their five years in power, the inflow to Sweden burst all bounds.

The former conservative government of Carl Bildt (m) as prime minister and Birgit “We Shall Overcome” Friggebo (fp) as immigration minister opened the 1991-94 Sweden for an immigration explosion from the Balkans which 1994 hit the ceiling with an All Time High of 78,987 residence permits granted. This record Fredrik Reinfeldt’s government has not yet beaten, but it snaps its bourgeois predecessors tightly in the hind legs, with an average admission of 75 000 foreigners per year since the 1st of January 2007. In total, the center-right alliance government since it came to power, has granted residence permits to 299,808 foreigners

More than 1.3 million foreigners have been granted residence permits

Migration Board statistics on residence permits granted  only goes back to 1980. The large flows of asylum seekers in the 1970s came from Chile and other parts of Latin America but are not included. During the period 1980-2010, a total of just over 1.3 million, or precisely 1,304,933 foreigners were granted residence permits in Sweden, including refugees, economic migrants, adopted children, visiting students and immigration under the EEA Agreement.

Politicians and media want the Swedish people to believe that all who come to Sweden are refugees fleeing war and persecution. So it is not at all. Of the 1.3 million who had to stay in Sweden after 1980 only 2.3% or 29,852 persons are refugees under the UN Geneva Convention. But Swedish politicians and authorities in addition to the Geneva Convention refugee criteria invented classifications they are alone with in the world, “de facto refugees” who in 1997 changed its name to “protected”, and the flexible concept of “humanitarian grounds”. Almost half of the 1.3 million granted a residence permit, 600, 000, have come through the chain immigration known as family reunification.

A systematic exchange of the Swedish population

There is a systematic exchange of the Swedish population. Swedish women have on an average 1.66 children. There are too few to avoid a decrease of the Swedish population.

Since 2002, the number of residents with foreign background (foreign born or native-born with two foreign born parents) increased by almost half a million, or 439,675 people. During the same period the number of residents with Swedish background (that also includes people born with one parent born abroad) increased by a mere 35,107 people. Persons with foreign background, in other words, during the past eight years has increased 12.5 times more than the Swedes.

It is only in six counties: the County of Stockholm, Uppsala, Södermanland County, Skåne, Halland and Västra Götaland County – which generally coincides with the three metropolitan areas – where the Swedish population is not reduced. In the other fifteen of the country’s 21 counties it diminishes strongly – while the number of inhabitants of foreign origin is increasing. In Stockholm County population those with foreign background increased twice as much as the Swedes during the past eight years. In Gothenburg, the foreign population increased  five times more than the Swedish.

What the public is not allowed to know

This is a fact that old media does not want to inform the public. No journalist is interested in translating Statistics Office, SCB, or Immigration Service statistics to understand the information. Statistics is available on the agencies’ websites, but it is often complex and clearly designed to not give rise to politically incorrect conclusions. Instead it is bloggers who do the job, working voluntarily from self-interest and social responsibility, compile statistics, detect trends, create graphics, write articles. One of them is Alfie’s statistics blog, which accounts for much of the statistical basis for this chronicle. His work shows the different messages that society’s elite do not want the Swedish people to know – that Sweden is heading toward extinction of its indigenous people.

A wide range of local residents are voting with their feet and move in what is called “white flight”. In particular in Södertälje and Malmö Swedes are fleeing from multiculturalism as the migrants move in. During the period, 3576 Swede were leaving Södertälje, and 1795 Malmö residents with Swedish background saying goodbye to Ilmar Reepalu (s) multicultural inferno and moved. Landskrona, Botkyrka, Avesta, Borlänge, Ludvika and Söderhamn are other examples of immigrant communities the Swedes have abandoned. When you do not feel you have any ability to influence at the ballot box, leaving the forced multiculturalism is all that remains – for those who can. In the silence, there is a migration within the country of unprecedented magnitude, and there are population movements that we never hear politicians or media speak of.

Swedes in the minority in the big cities in 2050

In two municipalities, Botkyrka and Haparanda, immigrants form the majority in 2010. If the immigration rate in the period 1997-2010 will persist, in 2050 the immigrants will be in majority and those of Swedish background in the minority in all three cities Stockholm, Göteborg (Gothenburg) and Malmö.

If the immigration rate since the Alliance Government came to power continues, we will see an even faster transformation of the Swedes becoming a minority. It’s only 39 years to 2050.

We who live now already live in a converted country where Swedish culture and Western values are on the way into the memories archive. The country that our children and grandchildren will live in – in what ways will it remind you of Sweden? Will there be anything left of the country we once had?

“Come on, at least remember, dear red, blue and colorless friends, your own children will keep you accountable for the much poorer society that you are on track to leave behind you to them, because you did not act in time.”

Helmuth Nyborg, a professor emeritus at Aarhus University, writes in an article entitled “Indigenous in the minority” in Jyllands-Posten. In the article he points out Sweden as a warning to Denmark and Europe. I will return to his conclusions later.

Immigration from MENA has almost doubled

Fredrik Reinfeldt’s government has stepped up immigration significantly compared to the previous Social Democratic government. Admissions from Muslim countries, the Middle East and Africa has grown particularly rapidly. Including immigration from some countries with clusters of hard-to-integrate inhabitants (including Bulgaria, former Yugoslavia, Moldova, Romania), immigration from these countries since the alliance government came to power nearly doubled from 1463 people per month to 2711 per month.

The immigration and asylum that will be fair and follow the Aliens Act, as reported by “Miggs” in practice degenerated into free immigration. “Miggs” are employed at the immigration office who in frustration and despair write anonymously on Merit Wager blog.

The trial of labor migrants has become a joke, because the devices that will handle it caN just as easily be replaced with ink pads. Insurance, Central Board of Student Aid, Pensions Agency and social administrations happily pay the premium, year after year, to persons who are residing illegally in the country. The examples are hair-raising. Here are some of the “Miggs” stories:

Desperate “Miggs’ report on abused asylum

• Father and son had a permit which expired in autumn 2007. Has since THEN had everything paid (housing, healthcare, education, food and lodging, and clothing) of the municipality they live in. All was revealed when the father was arrested on suspicion of residential burglary.

• A woman divorced in 2006 when her husband left Sweden. She simply remained, and had everything paid (housing, language training, internships, room and board) of the municipality she lived in for nearly five years. This was discovered when the woman searched PUT (permanent residence) and said that she had grounds for protection against their homeland. Protection that she kept to herself for half a decade. (Merit Wager)

• “A man lacked grounds for asylum, but the authorities gave in and granted his request for “humanitarian reasons”, mostly because he had children. When the man got PUT in Sweden he did not want to study Swedish or work. He became angry when pulled in social assistance because of his total unwillingness to do a single right thing. This man did not think it was right by the Swedish government to make demands on him. He felt there was money in Sweden and that he was entitled to inspect them. He never learned Swedish, never took a white job. He lived at the lowest economical limit of the social services, the housing benefits and child allowances and worked black a few years. He then moved back to their homeland, rented out the apartmentsecond-hand to 10-15 asylum seekers at the same time, all paid 1500 crowns each. His children he left with relatives. He made sure to come here occasionally to collect housing benefits and child allowances and show up at the employment office and social services to prevent his permanent residence permit from being revoked. He is now a Swedish citizen. “(Merit Wager)

• “Miggs” tells of Somalis who are not Somalis, who fails to report to their own asylum investigations, Eritreans with three different identities. (Merit Wager)

The right to asylum is being abused systematically.

• “As for example, children in families with PUT due to family relations leave the “home” without “the parents” caring and they then apply for asylum claims as unaccompanied children from Somalia, Iraq or Eritrea – to get these new parents, now mostly biological. The social authorities are obviously worried and care about these “children”. For the most part, they are of course not children, but people whose age was in doubt as soon as they got here, then because of the family relation. But it was accepted anyway. “(Merit Wager)

“Miggs” has for many years reported a totally derailed immigration policy. No one cares. Journalists: read through thoroughly Merit Wager blog, as they read Snaphanen, Politically Incorrect, document.no, Uriasposten, Alfie’s statistics blog, Free Times, Jan Millds blog, MXP and many other blogs. But they would rather die than admit it and – worse yet – pretend that they have acquired some politically incorrect knowledge. They continue to edit reality. How the process works, I would rather not have any insight, but Hans Rustad provides a description on document.no.

An unresolved personal neurosis govern Sweden

One person who definitely does not care is Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt (Moderate). He’s too busy trying to feel uncomfortable with leading a minority government, a position that for someone with his personality is a deadly insult. Fredrik Reinfeldt wants to decide for himself. All his frustration over reigning in the minority, all the anger and all shortcomings he projects to a democratically elected parliamentary party, the Sweden Democrats. Fredrik Reinfeldt tolerates them, but he does not accept that more than 300,000 voters have voted them into Parliament. They are an ever-present red rag to his eyes. Again and again the Swedish Prime Minister repeats that he intends to do everything possible to isolate the democratically elected party from political influence. Thus speaks an anti-Democrat. By all accounts Fredrik Reinfeldt bears on some form of bullying problems that are so raw and unconscious that it is lived out in front of the open curtain. An unresolved personal neurosis is in practise controlling Sweden. Add to that  the borderline goodness psychotic syndrome of all politicians that manifests itself in a desire to be world champion to take care of all Earth’s people – and the image of a sinking ship is becoming clearer.

Change in the law for more Somalis

“You can always rearrange the deck when the ship sinks.”

(Quote by journalist Frederick Lyons (Ben Wishaw) in the BBC’s critic acclaimed series “The Hour”, which was recently broadcast on Swedish TV.)

That is about what the government Reinfeldt is doing. Reshuffles the deck. His desperation over the minority seat has thrown himself into the Green Party’s immigration extremist arms. Only SD can be isolated from the influence, it does not matter if Sweden falls. As a first step, the law changed so that all Somalis could invite their relatives without passports or other identification documents. The group includes Somali mothers who have fled and abandoned their large broods and, when they themselves have set themselves in safety, had launched campaigns to reunite with their children – in Sweden.

In addition, children who are staying illegally in Sweden receive free schooling. The party is expected to initially cost 850 million kronor, mainly to ensure that there is a large sum of money available, but no one knows how many people will take advantage of the changes ..

“I want my tax money back “

Joao, immigrants from Portugal, writes one of the 772 comments to the news on Politically incorrect:

“Yes, I, as a Portuguese, European and Swedish taxpayer was extremely angry at this news that Somalis will continue to invade Europe. In Portugal, we Angolans, but Angola was our colony and they receive no subsidies, they have to work. In Portugal, we give no asylum because we do not want to be involved in the refugee industry that has hit Sweden and Norway.

I’ve lived here for almost 4 years and love the Swedish culture and tradition, but I find it reprehensible that you import the poorest Islamists. In Europe we can all both read, write, etc. … How the hell will they get a job here? They know they can not find work, but it’s pure lottery. I am a foreigner, I know that Sweden is not my country, but you have to reflect more. We in Europe have a thousand years of Christian tradition, with philosophy, openness, and we have learned to show solidarity with each other. I want to see the day when Africans will give us their money …

I WANT MY TAX MONEY BACK. I prefer to help Swedish pensioners or other Christians and not to support al-Shabaab’s future. Sorry if I sound harsh, but I’m upset. “

“We’ve got onl’each other”

Swedish immigration policy based on a fatal illusion, namely that all immigrants are like us, or at least just as Swedes as soon as they set foot on Swedish soil. And if they do not become Swedes it is simple to fix with a generous billion rolling and a little social engineering.

2004  a picture was taken of the four non-socialist party leaders at the home of the Centre Party leader Maud Olofsson. Those who look closely at the picture see an embroidered hanging above the heads of the bourgeois. Someone, perhaps Maud Olofsson herself, has embroidered: “The best we have is each other.” It was almost the same words as she sobbed out at her luckiily last speech in Almedalen July 7 this year:

We’ve jus’ got each other. We’re just people.

Let us hope that after resignation as party leader this week she is fully committed to embroidery, which is a quiet job.

“Everyone is equal” – conscious manipulation

For the seven left parties in the parliament and all of the politically correct opinion establishment in Sweden, all  facts about immigration consequences are uninteresting. As the impact appears increasingly clear  of their united cliches sound increasingly hollow:

“What’s the difference? We are all human beings! “

The adorned so-called “values” of every human being are misinterpreted to claim that all people are equal. It is a deliberate attempt at manipulation. The apostles of the “value basis” are not stupid enough not to realize that the thesis of every human being is becoming increasingly difficult to defend as more and more see the obvious differences in culture and morality, self-support, desire for integration, crime, welfare dependency, and more. In order to legitimize an insane policy of trying to increasingly desperately lull us into believing that all people are equal.

Karl-Olov Arnstberg, a retired professor of ethnology, writes about the value basis on Merit Wager blog:

“Value basis is a concept that crept in through the back door of the political landscape. The person or persons who do not have the right values, it is legitimate to bully. Core Value basis is, In other words, a concept that turns against the right to think and think freely. Sure, you think freely, but you will not play on our farm. Do not have the right values So we will not hire you, and do notsue your services. If wefrom this proceed to the question of equal value, so it is a rhetorical phrase that sounds good but does not have any sense of reality. People have never been equal, not in Sweden today and not yesterday, nor anywhere else. They will never ever be so. People have different value but pretend it is not so. The philosopher Slavoj Zizek denotes “equal value” as an ideological fantasy. The concept has no political representation but functions merely as a sorting tool. “

Vulgar perceptions that all men are equal is nothing but political demagoguery of the most dishonest type. Those who pronounce them are far from from all knowledge of the most central in people: identity and belonging. Identities are formed in the context in which they are born and grow up, the family, language, culture and religion. All people want to belong to a context in which they are similar and can identify with each other, and where they share the same standards and codes of conduct.

Foreign born over-represented in the demand for supply

The differences between people of different origin manifests itself with crystal clear clarity in all areas of society. More than 50% of the immigrants live on welfare, and many of the rest live on the other schemes. Finance Minister Anders Borg (m) have every reason to be concerned, as shown in this video footage from the Fiscal Policy Council panel discussion on June 1.

Immigrants in Sweden use over 8.8 times the income support (welfare) compared with the Swedish-born population. They represent 14.7% of Sweden’s population but consume 60.2% of total social benefits. The figure would be even higher if not only foreign-born, but also people with foreign background were included.

Highest foreign-born over-representation in Växjö, where they consume 78.9% of the cost of income support (21.5 times more than the Swedes). In Södertälje 77.8%, in Botkyrka 77.2, in Malmö 75.4, in Kristianstad 72.6%, 67.5 in Stockholm and Göteborg (Gothenburg) 66.7%.

Of all the expenses in the public sector almost half, 41% is the costs of social protection (various social transfer systems), while the roughly cut-down health care, with half the number of inpatient beds disappearing in 30 years, only costs 13%. Immigrants’ high dependency pulls up social spending substantially.

Highest IQ in East Asia, the lowest in Africa

Since the National Institute of eugenics, race biology, in the 1920s and the Nazi extermination of the Jewsi all talk of race and biological differences is taboo. Taboo of course does not take away the large differences in, for example, the average intelligence quotient, IQ, found in various parts of the world and is well-documented in research.

Residents of East Asian regions like Hong Kong, Singapore, Japan, China, Taiwan, North and South Korea have the highest average IQ of 105-108. Native northerners have an average IQ of 98-100. Middle East countries have low average IQ, and  the lowest are in Africa, in Iraq the average IQ is 87, in Afghanistan and Pakistan 84, Tunisia, Syria and Libya, 83, Lebanon 82, Egypt 81, Kenya 72, Ethiopia 71, Nigeria 69 , Eritrea and Somalia 68, and Gambia 66. Somalis have thus one of the world’s lowest average IQ of 68.

The threshold for mental retardation is at an IQ of 70. With an IQ between 70 and 85 you are considered a weak talent. Weak talented people lack capacity for abstract thinking and often do not reach a higher intelligence age than approximately 11-13 years.

Ole Jorgen Anfindsen writes in the book Selvmordsparadigmet:

“More research is necessary for us to know how large differences evolution has provided us with. Apart from the supporters of the after-war paradigm, of course. They need not wait for any research. They just know inside themselves that the differences are minor and only has to do with the external characteristics such as hair, skin pigment, and then some. The reason that after-war paradigmatics deo not have to wait for the facts is that they mean that the truth must be subordinate to an important principle, namely to create a better world free from racism. What you say is really that you want to try to make reality better by lying – a project no one has yet succeeded with.”

All lower grades in primary school

Obviously the receiving host countries are influenced in a variety of ways of the massive immigration from countries with low average IQ, for example, the Middle East and Africa.

“Children who have immigrated to Sweden are leaving the ninth grade with significantly lower grades than children born in Sweden. This is regardless of whether they have received all of their primary education in Sweden or not,” reports the magazine Education World.

The difference is great between students from different countries. How many percent of the students who last year went out elementary school broken down by country of birth was qualified to high school:

  • U.S. – 90.1
  • Norway – 86.3
  • UK – 85.0
  • Turkey – 46.9
  • Serbia and Montenegro – 46.7
  • Somalia – 24.6
  • Foreign background, total – 75.5
  • Swedish background – 91.2

Not even one in four students from Somalia is passing tests for secondary studies.

Declining IQ reduces GDP

In Denmark it is not as terrifying to talk about differences in IQ as in Sweden. In an article in Jyllands-Posten writes Professor Helmuth Nyborg:

“A number of global-scale studies show that a country’s average IQ quite accurately predicts the nation’s gross domestic product, people’s productivity and its economic vitality. Immigrants from sub-Saharan Africa have an average IQ of 70. We see that, taken as a group, they have serious problems in obtaining a qualifying education in all countries to which they so far have migrated to, and that they, like the Swedes with the same low IQ, are at high risk of living permanently on grant support. ”

He warned that free immigration from low-IQ countries will inevitably reduce the Swedish IQ average and thus reduce Sweden’s productivity and international competitiveness.

Europe settles itself

In another article in Jyllands-Posten writes Professor Nyborg:

“No one is answerable to apparently discuss the implications of the historically large changes in European demographics where Europe since the 1980s have seen a massive immigration of low IQ immigrants from non western countries. Forecasts suggest that Denmark, Sweden and Norway, even the whole of Europe is about to settle themselves as democratic welfare states. Five percent lower IQ is equivalent to a reduction in the gross domestic product, GDP, by 35%. Nor should we expect well-established democracies in countries with lower average IQ than 90. What is going on with immigration from countries with low average IQ is the most dramatic demographic upheaval ever – and it’s irreversible. “

The trend should hold policymakers sleepless. While they deliberately undermine the future of the Nordic countries, it is clear that a sharp intellect becomes an increasingly important survival condition. “Intellect in top shape to the future chances” is the title of an article in Swedish newspaper Svenska Dagbladet.

The future depends on the endowment. There are no unskilled jobs anymore, they have rationalized away. From being an agricultural society, we have gone back to being a high-tech industrial nation. In such a society are all losers who can not benefit from training and all the hard working people who will support them for life.

They give away something that does not belong to them

The politicians know this of course. They are at least paid well to know. Fredrik Reinfeldt has 144,000 SKR a month in basic salary to pursue policies that benefit Sweden and the Swedes. But he and all other politicians have painted themselves into a corner. Whatever insights that might reach them, they drill the heads deep in the sand. Now political panic gives a drizzle of measures in a stream, indicating some sort of awareness of the sinking of the country that a massive immigration from dysfunctional countries represents. But no one dares to suggest the only sensible, to restrict immigration to Convention refugees during the time it takes to work with the massive integration issues that Sweden has. You get to talk about integration, but never to limit the extreme influx of immigrants who come to live on benefits for life. Miljard SKR projects fail, one after the other, so that no one dares to turn off the inflow valve.

A Swedish government took the decision earlier. Through the so-called Lucia decision in 1989 the Social Democrats of Sweden closed for all but recognized refugees. It lasted for two years, until Carl Bildt’s center-right government set aside the decision and opened the borders 1991.

How many billions will politicians’ ostrich mentality and Fredrik Reinfeldt’s personal persecution manias against SD cost Swedish taxpayers?

The truth is that politicians are giving away something that does not belong to them. They give away our land without asking us who live here for any kind of permission. It can only end in one way: badly.

By Julia Cæsar

Translated to English by Ralph Haglund

  ......

Julia Caesar in English: Father of the Nation and Transparency. Oct. 17 2010.

http://snaphanen.dk/2010/10/17/julia-caesar-landsfadern-och-oppenheten/

Copyright © Julia Caesar, Snaphanen

[The translator's comments in brackets.]

Finally the Prime Minister stood at the pulpit. He spoke and said:

Sweden will be a country characterized by openness. Something of the most genuinely Swedish we have is our tradition of openness to the world. In Sweden, generations of people who fled oppression and poverty had a chance to start a new life. They have enriched our country, made us wiser and given us a more developed society. They contribute to our prosperity. Without transparency, Sweden had been a poorer country.

The words were spoken by Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt (m [moderates]). He has obviously not written them myself. It is his speechwriter who have filed the statement of government as Reinfeldt read it out when the parliament opened. The ‘Statement of Government’ represents young children’s wish list to Santa Claus, but should also set the tone for how the present Government will do its work during the term of office, ie until the election 2014. You have to put in as many fluffy and promising words as possible. Words like “responsibility”, “transparency”, “security” and “welfare” that sound good but not really commit to anything. Bread and circuses to the people. The word “liability” occurs twelve times in the Statement of Government.

I have read the Statement of Government and the Government’s budget for 2011 in the chapters of “Migration” and “Integration and Gender Equality“.

To you, dear readers, I’ll translate the fluffy words to realpolitik and tell you what to expect during the next four years. The starting point is to put words in the immigration policies pursued by different governments in recent decades and especially of the bourgeois alliance government for the past four years.

The human smugglers are in control

The number of foreigners granted permanent residence, PUT, in Sweden since 2006 has been at record highs of around 100 000 per year. Last year 102 449 new immigrants arrived with 168 different nationalities.

If the numbers for the first three quarters are maintained, this year we can expect a new immigration record of 106 000 people. Of those, only 2% of refugees will be according to the Geneva Convention and a similar number of quota refugees.

The “transparency” the Prime Minister talks about really means that Sweden does not have any control over what kind of people are allowed into the country. Who and how many they are is controlled exclusively by the criminal trafficking gangs who earn billions on directing human beings to the humane and open Sweden. This is accepted by both government and parliament. They not only agree. They are actively promoting human smuggling by carrying the world’s most irresponsible immigration policy. That’s how youshould  understand their talk of “transparency”.

The government wants the borders to remain wide open for all sorts of unidentified criminals, terrorists, rapists, forced marriage child brides, robbers, thieves, killers, pimps, arsonists, islamists, human trafficking victims, drug offenders, women who preferred to veil themselves in full tent instead of work and support  themselves, and various other unspecified adventurers without grounds for asylum. This is a truly Swedish tradition. Immigration Service simply does not know what you let into the country, and it knows no one else does either. Only 4% have valid credentials. 96% do not want to show who they are or even what country they come from. It has so far resulted that Sweden is home to more than 1 500 war criminals and an additional unknown number of terrorists and other hardened criminals. One of the war criminals, the first and so far the only one that has been arrested in Sweden is 43-year-old Ahmet Makitan. He is now on trial, on reasonable suspicion of serious crimes under international law, murder, kidnapping and torture. He came to Sweden from Bosnia-Herzegovina in 2001 and became a Swedish citizen 2006. Such effects of transparency the Prime Minister does not mention.

Men refusing to shake hands with female decision-makers

The Prime Minister mentions nothing about how the everyday work may seem to women employees at the Board. One of the policy makers to realize “the Swedish tradition of openness” tells on Merit Wager’s blog about his meetings with Muslim women asylum seekers:

I meet only too often in my work as a decision maker at the Migration Board asylum seeker men who refuse to shake hands with me because I am a woman. They also often switch the administrator for the same reason. How will these men at all be able to work in Sweden, if they get the PUT? In Sweden, they will be forced to shake hands with women, and even if they open their own, such as a kiosk, they will be forced to accept money from women customers, if they do not introduce a system where money is left in a jar and the product is thrown to the customer over the disk.

Why are these people attracted to Sweden?

Although they would have had problems in their own country there is of course a number of countries in the Arab world where they can find themselves and where they can live the way they are accustomed to living.

What is the cost of immigration?

Fredrik Reinfeldt talks about “generations of people who fled oppression and poverty and had a chance to start a new life”, he should instead – if he wanted to describe reality – say: “In Sweden we have in the past 30 years received 1.3  million foreigners of whom the overwhelming majority did not fly from oppression. Only about 5% are refugees. Poverty is, according to the Aliens Act no grounds for asylum. It would then mean safe passage to Sweden for all residents of poor countries on earth, and it is an impossibility. “

When the Prime Minister says “They contribute to our prosperity” it is a highly relative statement.

Employment immigration to Sweden in the 1950s and 60s contributed greatly to building a Swedish prosperity. But it was only a brief parenthesis in the history of migration. Since the 1980s, immigration goes every year with increasing multi-billions in losses. How big the losses are, no government has hitherto wanted to present to the voters. We’ll just pay and look happy. A very large and growing proportion of immigrants do not contribute at all but rather consume a  growing share of what others are working together. Unemployment among immigrants was in 2007 on average 2.5 times higher than among Swedes, and has increased substantially over the past term. Of those who have come from Iraq, 73% of women and 60% of men are still unemployed after ten years in Sweden. Only 35% of men and 20% of women from Iraq, Afghanistan and Somalia have any work at all, which means they work at least one hour a week.

The cries of help because of ruptured social budgets are sounding more and more from the municipalities. It is local politicians who effectively are forced to take care of what their party colleagues on the national level impose on them. The contribution of expanding immigration of illiterate and to-be-supported for life will in the not too distant future, result in that the Mother Svea’s coffers are empty inexorably and loan possibilities have been exhausted. “Welfare” will be a k-marked word in the antiquarian section of the Swedish Academy’s dictionary. Something that we who have experienced welfare can talk about at a memory evening in geriatric care – if we receive any.

At least 400 000 new immigrants by 2014

From the Statement of Government Policy and Budget, I made a little compilation of what we can expect over the next four years with the Alliance. The forecast is based on the policies that Government has pursued since 2006. The call for cooperation now under way between the Conservatives and the Greens will lead to an even more “generous” policy and further record levels in the Swedish admission of new immigrants. The Green Party is known for working with the Left and both like to have a largely unregulated immigration. Mikaela Valtersson (mp [miljöpartiet, the Greens] ) is now investigating on behalf of the Government new ways for migrants wishing to come to Sweden. The party was called by the writer and blogger in Jan Milld “The Immigration Party The Good “.

This is what we will see over the next four years – feel free to save the Chronicle and do a reality check in 2014.

  • More than 400 000 new immigrants will be granted the PUT. Probably more, depending on how much influence the Green Party may have. This is equivalent to five cities of the size of Södertälje, populated only by new immigrants. Of the new immigrants, around 160 000 from Muslim countries, who are, according to the Quran prohibited to be integrated among the “infidel” Swedes.

From the Budget proposition:

Sweden continues to be one of the countries in Europe which gives most people protection from

Violence and persecution. In 2009, Sweden was one of the countries in Europe to which most asylum seekers came and today there is no indication that the number of asylum seekers to Sweden will be reduced to any significant extent in the coming years.

  • Increased unemployment. Unemployment is currently 8.4%. Youth unemployment is 25%. A migration of the order of half a million people in four years, most of whom have little or no education at all, is inevitably an unemployment and benefit immigration.
  • Thus the so-called exclusion [the new-Swedish word 'utanförskap' is defined in many words in the Swedish Wikipedia, but no English equivalent exists. It means a social alienation from others, outside society] will glow, which the Conservatives say they want to fight, to new record levels.

More people must work harder to support more people

  • Increased social costs. From 2008 to 2009, welfare payments by as much as 17%. 422 300 persons were in households that received financial assistance at some point last year. It is the highest number of welfare recipients since 2002. From the cost of just over 11 billion SEK, 6.75 billion was for foreign-born, including introductory benefits to refugees. Swedish-born citizens cost 4.31 billion SEK. This means that the Swedes had 39%, while foreign-born, including refugees (who constitute 14% of the population) received 61% of financial assistance.
  • The idea of “work first”, as the Conservatives drive hard, will be strengthened even more. Healthy and sick, the lame and the broken shall be available for work whether there is work or not. The right (and obligation soon?) to work is extended to 69 years of age. In order to supply an increasing proportion of immigrants who will never enter the labor market, it is necessary that all the others work even more and longer.
  • Illegal immigrants will get free healthcare and schooling, according to the new Integration Minister Erik Ullenhag (fp [folkpartiet]) in the Radio Sweden program Echo, Saturday interview.

It is a requirement that for long has been pushed hard by especially the Green Party and Left Party, but the Conservatives have said no to. Now in the horse-trading between the moderates  with the Immigration Party The Good they have to give the rights to those who do not even have the right to reside in Sweden. A general amnesty for all who are staying illegally in Sweden is one of the Green Party’s demands.

Cleaners, kitchen assistants and newspaper sellers

  • Many more young men, so-called “unaccompanied refugee children” arrive in Sweden as an anchor for large families and travelling ambassadors for Islam. This is fully in line with the desire of the government. Some blocks are not. The cost increases in 2011 is 500 million SEK. More and more privately owned enterprises are making multi-million SEK profits at the “kids” that can cost 3015 SEK per day, ie more than 1.1 million per year and “children” only in housing costs. There is no ceiling for the cost of health care providers can charge the taxpayers, says Today’s Society.
  • The workers that were introduced in 2008 will increase significantly, despite the current unemployment. This year, 13 550 labor migrants come to Sweden.

(Graphic: Affe)

Most of these lack training and will to do unskilled low paid jobs. In four years it will be 54 204 immigrant workers. We will be getting an injection of about 1800 cleaners, some 2000 kitchen and catering assistants, 4080 housekeeping and restaurant services workers, 384 warehouse and transport assistants and over 400 newspaper distributors and caretakers.

Why import tens of thousands of unskilled people from other countries when we have almost half a million unemployed? One thing is certain: this is not primarily of concern for labor migrants. One answer, according to the principle “follow the money”, is that the bourgeois governments always stands near the business, and particularly the informal underground economy will have an inexhaustible need for cheap unskilled labor outside of any agreement. This applies particularly to the hotel and catering, cleaning and sanitation sectors and warehouses and transportation. For employers, it is ideal with people who are dependent, and require no rights. Refugees are ideal for these purposes and can be ruthlessly exploited. About this the unions are completely silent.

Thrown away integration billions and increased crime

  • Even more billions will be poured in integration. It is a policy that consumes huge amounts of money but is a gigantic failure. The integration efforts are doomed to fail as long as the other end continues with unlimited admission of new immigrants. If an analogy is allowed: you have a water leak that damages the house, close first the main valve before taking other measures. It will also never be called ‘hostile to water’.
  • The crime rate will continue to grow and become increasingly violent. Rape will increase even more. Since 1975, the reported rapes increased by 673%. Violent crime has risen steadily for 35 years and will reach new record highs. Aggravated assault, muggings, knife murders, arson and gunfire will become even more common.
  • Housing shortage is growing. More and more young people can not leave home because a large proportion of existing houses is a priority to immigrants. This is a conscious priority from politicians. But they do not speak loudly about it.

The Paradox of Openness

  • The government Reinfeldt talk about “transparency”. There is a problematic paradox. The more open borders of Sweden, and the more immigration from Muslim countries, the more it reduces the transparency and freedom of expression. We get more of introversion, fear, censorship and political correctness. It is the inexorable consequence wherever Islam has influence. In multicultural societies throughout the world is freedom of speech, the first major victim. Criticizing Islam is often punishable by death.
  • Propaganda will increase. The clearer the Swedish people are experiencing the impact of government policy, the greater the propaganda efforts. Media are of course included as megaphones. It is already very clear. Have we ever heard so many speak in lofty falsetto of “equal value”, sometimes replaced with “everybody’s unique value”, as after the election? There will be more. To get us to swallow the government with its policy of deliberately destroying our country by increasing the mass immigration, we will be the subject of “values action”, that is political propaganda designed to change our attitudes and eliminate the traces of self-preservation that might be left. We will hear more about “tolerance”, “enrichment”, “transparency”, “Swedish tradition”, “humanity”, “values”, “action against racism” and “immigrants are needed to safeguard the welfare”.

Internet is a democratic revolution

What the government of Reinfeldt ignores is a force that has grown enormously in importance only since the 2006 election. I refer to the Internet, and I would say that no state propaganda machine has any longer a fraction of the power it had before the advent of the Internet, if we ignore the dictatorships. The Internet is the largest democratic breakthrough since the invention of printing. This is where hope is. To maintain a healthy scepticism read independent blogs and other free information on the Internet, one of the best immune-enhancing measures that can be taken against the old media’s misinformation.

  • As long as the center-right alliance government continues its unbridled mass immigration policy, the recent sustained Sweden Democrats will continue to grow. SD has doubled its share of voters in every election so far. There is no indication that this trend will be broken. All seven of the old parliamentary parties seem to be unable to recognize that it is their policies that are the basis for SD’s success. People are voting in large part to the SD of powerlessness and protest that the seven party conglomerate does not give them any choice.

The bad judgment of the Prime minister

Rather than examine themselves for possible causes why 340 000 voters voted in the SD in parliament, Fredrik Reinfeldt finds it hard to hide that he is terminally provoked by the democratic election results. He is so provoked that he regresses to the sandpit level for kiddies. On several occasions he has shown poor discretion and poor self-control. He seems more like a man with totalitarian ambitions and an ominous inability to control his temper. A small collection of quotes:

Old Swedish traditions are simply barbarism. The rest of the development has come from outside. “

Said in immigrant dense Ronna in Södertälje a  few weeks after the 2006 elections.

I would like to point out that those who live on boosting a we-and-them mentality and a fundamentally hateful way of looking at relationships between people should not be surprised if this happens.

Said in Malmö about Sweden Democrats just before the election, after violent attacks against SD politicians and organized disturbances of the party’s public meetings.

They, the Sweden Democrats, are in fact saying that it is people, not the system, which is wrong, that they should be expelled because they look different from us. (Göteborgs-Posten, not online, on 7 October.)

Lies at the National Press Club

Fredrik Reinfeldt apparently thinks he can crush the SD by showing contempt and sneering. He shows, for a Father of the Nation, spectacular unrestrained, scornful and arrogant behaviour. The National Press Club’s post-election debate at the time of 1:25 gives the prime minister a formidable show of scorn and contempt.

He is churning out that it is the whole idea of  SD and their breath of life to be misunderstood and have a martyr’s role, they love it. Whether they also love to be abused and knife-cut, he does not answer. As if that was not enough with contempt and arrogance the Prime Minister is lying in an astonishing way in the PC-debate. He claims that it is impossible to change the Swedish immigration policy that “we are bound by international conventions, agreements and the growing EU-regulated policy that we follow.” It is a sensational claim. So we have a Prime Minister who deliberately tries to mislead people into believing that all foreigners who come to Sweden are refugees and that Sweden is bound by international conventions to take them all. In fact, the refugees who have been granted asylum in Sweden under the Geneva Convention in the past 30 years, is a paltry 5% of all persons entitled to the PUT. This year, the proportion falls to 2%.

Fredrik Reinfeldt will never be a Father of the Nation

No,  Fredrik Reinfeldt will never be a Father of the Nation. For such a necessary personal maturity. Reinfeldt’s totalitarian ambition of power is too obvious, his personal immaturity too big. There are personality traits that will cause it to him. When politicians have so far been forced to resign, the reason most often has been to find weaknesses in the personal character. Power intoxication in combination with a lack of maturity and self-distance has got this person to believe that you can get away with financial irregularities and other abuses of power. Some examples: Attorney General Ove Rainer 1983, Attorney Anna-Greta Leijon, 1988, Mona Sahlin, 1995, Laila Freivalds, who resigned twice, in 2000 and 2006 – all Social Democrats, Schyman (v) 2003, Maria Borelius and Cecilia Stegö Chilò 2006, Sven- Otto Littorin 2010, all Conservatives.

Reinfeldt has not a particularly reassuring environment either. The assignments as group leader of the Moderate Party and chairman of the Finance Committee has gone to Anna Kinberg Batra. About her S R Larson writes, a researcher at a U.S. Think Tank , on the blog Hayekinstitutet:

Kinberg is certainly a nice person, but a pure political animal, and equipped with a political cynicism, which, unfortunately, over the years, has gained the upper hand. One of her most illustrative political comments came when I confronted her with an arbitrary police working method: they set up general identity checks in the subway in Tensta and Rinkeby and extracted from travellers their identity cards without any reason. Kinberg was sitting at the time in the Board of Directors of the Police and I invited her to address the issue. When she hesitated, I asked if she would be equally hesitating whether this was been out on Stureplan. Her response was that “I have more voters in Spy Bar than  in Rinkeby”.

Kinberg’s political cynicism, combined with her genuine lack of training in macroeconomics and knowledge of economic policy makes it extremely problematic to have her as chairman of the Finance Committee. She stood in line to become a minister this time, but the prime minister is apparently hesitant regarding her past. Therefore, she got the rather heavy position as finance committee chairman – in other words, she got it for exactly the wrong reason.

Since I have been drinking alcohol in the company of both the Lego Minister (Anders Borg) and Mrs Kinberg Batra, I have had the opportunity to discuss politics with them both in, shall we say relaxed conditions. The gist of the discussions is that the economic policy of Sweden is now led by a formidable duo of ignorant former Socialist clowns who will make Ringholm and Jan Bergkvist look like geniuses.

With the policy of the Government of Sweden the only thing remaining is to choose a new people. And that is precisely what is going on.

By Julia Caesar

Earlier Chronicles by the same author: Julia Caesar: När Sverige rämnade and Fler ministrar borde gråta. Tjugoen oönskade krönikor, 2010.

[Translated after permission from author,  by Ralph Haglund....]

Julia Caesar in English: Letter to the Prime Minister. May 9, 2010

Julia Caesar is one of the few in Sweden who is politically incorrect enough to tell the truth.

Sunday Chronicle:: Letter to Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt, Sweden

May 9, 2010

Copyright © Julia Caesar, Snaphanen

I have received a letter from Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt. It’s not every day you get a letter from the Prime Minister, so I feel honored and read the letter carefully. Fredrik Reinfeldt writes:

“I want to leave a clear message from the Conservatives. We see all of you. ”

Thanks, it feels good to know.

I’ve been thinking about what to answer Fred. For I belong to a generation that believes that one should respond to a letter. I hope you will read my reply, Fred. Now I begin:

Dear Fred!

Thank you for your letter. I understand that I mean a lot to you, because you do yourself the trouble to write me a letter. You write that you Conservatives will do everything to make Sweden a leading country. You want me to know that you can see me and all those living in Sweden. You want my vote.

Sorry if I sound a little brutal. But, dear Frederick, feel blown! My vote you will not have.

The Sweden which you and the rest of the alliance government has created is nothing that I want. Everything that was nice and safe in Sweden you have dismantled and destroyed. It was Sweden that I and others in my generation and generations before me built up, a country that we loved and wanted to preserve.

Grief over a lost Sweden

We are many now living, mind you, who mourn a lost Sweden. We grew up in a country where it was safe to live, where you could trust each other and where there was a belief in the future. Many of us were poor, but with training and individual work, we could build a future for ourselves and our children. The country has been taken from us. The grief we bear constantly in us, is deep and sore. If you only knew how many tears I’ve cried over my lost country. Not so much for my own sake as for those I love and who come after me. The country that I wanted to give them no longer exists.

Yes, I know you were born in 1965 and was only a ten year old kid when the Swedish Parliament in 1975 took the unanimous decision to turn Sweden into a multicultural country. Probably you played football and was good in school at that time. I can not accuse you of that decision. It was the Social Democrats that formed the basis for mass immigration policy and put it in the system. But you in the center-right bloc can not just wash your hands. All political decisions of importance in this area have been unanimous. And you and other members of the alliance have not only continued to take a completely irresponsible policy. You have stepped up to even more madness.

Old Swedish is simply barbarism

I actually thought of you when you came to power 2006 I thought you could change anything about immigration policy after years of social democratic misrule. But when I opened the newspaper on 15 November 2006 – you had been prime minister for a month – I was disappointed. You had visited the immigrant area of Ronna in Södertälje and said verbatim:

“Old Swedish is only barbarism. The rest of the development has come from outside. ”

In any other country can a prime minister with impunity spit on his own country and its people, and even think they reap any points on it? Furthermore, what you are saying is not true. Sweden has had trade relations with the rest of the world for more than a thousand years. But if you  immigration development, so it was up to the 1950′s extremely limited. After 1970, however, we imported a considerable savagery.

You and your alliance friends engaged in the most extreme immigration policies. I wonder if you even noticed it? With the life you live, you will of course never actually be in contact with the immigration policy implications. Like all the other elite you live sheltered in an ethnic isolate. It is other people’s daughters who are raped in Sweden, European record of rape. It is other children who are being robbed, beaten and murdered.It is elderly parents of other people who are lying for hours in their feces when old-age care has exhausted their resources.

I have lived in multiculturalism

You must excuse me if I get a little personal. But unlike you and others who seek diversity, I have actually experienced it in my own life. For some years I lived in a multicultural area near you. It is the year I want to forget. There were fires in the elevators. The walls to the basement storage areas were cut apart and the storages were emptied. My bike was dismantled and stolen. A full day all residents sst trapped in our apartments after an immigrant fired up his apartment. The stairs were so smoke filled that you could not get out. Tulip bulbs that I planted in the flower beds were torn up even before they could flower. One morning I sat and ate breakfast, I heard banging from the stairwell. There stood a man in the process of beating the door of the apartment opposite with an ax. Yes, I was so enriched that I gotcockroaches in the kitchen cupboards and had to be evacuated while the apartment was cleaned up.

You know Fred, that the experience and many others have made me quite indifferent to multiculturalism. I know that many skilled immigrants have come to Sweden and work and contribute to welfare. It’s not them I’m talking about. It is the huge inlet of people who are not refugees or migrants prepared to take employment who worry me. As you know, they are in overwhelming majority.

I’ve actually read on and tried to figure out why you and the others in the alliance operate the multicultural policy with such a frenzy. But the more I read the less I understand. It can not be anything but enraged prestige that drives you. It is your own skin you are afraid of. Not ours. Only your own purses are well filled you don’t mind draining ours. Only you yourself can safely lean back in his chair from the Swedish Pewter in your safe inner-city apartments and villas  you happily leave for us to live with multiculturalism in our everyday lives.

Muslim mass immigration

You got the chance in 2006 to streamline Sweden’s immigration policy. You refused to take it. Instead, the contribution of immigration from Muslim countries has in recent years beaten all records, and according to all forecasts, the increase even more. More than 100 000 new PUT (permanent residence permits) are granted per year as free tickets to the welfare Swedish people have worked together and which will soon be a distant memory.

If you have not understood what the Muslim mass immigration means in the form of ever-greater demands for adaptation to a totalitarian, violent and oppressive ideology from the 600′s? Look around in Europe, Fred! See how Western culture and civilization, social trust and security are attacked in one country after another! Why would Sweden be spared Islamization and violence when we let in more immigrants from Muslim countries per capita than any other country and also has the world’s most faint-hearted politician, completely unable to set limits?

You probably think that I am unfair to focus solely on immigration policy. You’ve been doing other more important things. Yes, I know there was an economic crisis on top of everything else. You tended to emphasize it. You and Anders Borg have been busy with employment and to reduce exclusion, as you call it. But immigration policy is what has changed Sweden the most in modern times. And how is it that you are importing even more alienation in the form of tens of thousands of illiterate and others who, tojudge fairly, never will enter the labor market? Why did not you even limit the money-guzzling immigrationduring the deep economic crisis? How can we afford to be  the earth’s global social welfare office when you have cut back everything else? I and many others understand it simply can not be done.

The moderate Stalinism

Many people, especially your core voters, voted for you and the Conservatives for the emphasis of freedom. You say you care about people’s freedom to shape their own lives. It sounds so good. But what do you think those who voted for you for the sake of freedom of thought feel, when they were suddenly faced with the Moderate totalitarian, Stalinist side?

I simply say: Vellinge. The small municipality of Skåne, where the party secretary Per Schlingmann and Mr Billström let the moderate party whip whistle so that the echo, spread throughout the country. You forcedVellinge to accept the ultimatum: either voluntarily agree to accept so-called “unaccompanied refugee children” or be forced by law. You stomped the municipal autonomy down in the gravel. There is a name like that, dear Fred. It’s called Stalinism. Moderate Stalinism.

Or when you want the quota of women on company boards. Call it what you want Fred, but freedom it is not.

Yogurt, Islam and the contributions migrants

During your term, you have had time to be EU president too. Sweden had to lie fallow for a while. Instead, you devoted your energy to work for Turkey to join the EU. You made a fawning tour in Turkey where you claimed that “Europe needs Turkey”. Yes, you said even that Sweden needs Turkey. For what, I wonder? Why do we need yet another underdeveloped country that is not even in Europe? What can Turkey bring Europe more than yogurt, Islam and the contribution of migrants? Have we not enough of Muslim demand machines that live in self-imposed segregation and require everything from mosques to gender apartheid in public baths, hospitals and schools? Is it not enough that Greece must be supplied by the EU, namely from us? Perhaps we should first concern ourselves with Greece, Britain, Portugal and Spain’s crumbling economy before we draw to us more? And perhaps our own?

There are those who say that immigration policy wins no elections. Do you think that too, Fred? Is that why you refuse to discuss it? Or are you just painfully aware that you do not have any arguments? Do you think like crass party strategists that voters only care about dollars and cents? If so, you really need to relieve the Swedish taxpayers from the enormous burden on our shoulders, the costs of immigration. Here you have a real saving tip!

It is true that you and all the politicians before you consistently refused to disclose the cost of this particular line. Curiously, as all other costs are constantly analyzed in all ways. You know that it concerns hundreds of billions a year. But it is not allowed to be recognized in the event that the Swedish people would get the idea of rebelling.

Social Conservatives – a totalitarian party

Now for the first time a critical immigration party, Sweden Democrats, is on the way into parliament. I am sorry to say it, Fred, but you’ll have permission to swallow it. Instead of fretting and bite your nails, I suggest you search yourself and others in the alliance – hard. For there is nobody else but you who have paved the way for SD. With everything you have done and especially what you have done during your four years in power, you have been preparing for the SD and strewed palm leaves and roses in their path. You have made it through kicking liker a donkey to continue to run the world’s most extreme immigration policies and stubborn as mountain goats you refuse to discuss it. Arrogance of power speaks for itself. Do not think for one moment that we voters do not note it.

Unless otherwise noted we do it when your party and the Social Democrats recently declared themselves ready to govern the municipality of Stockholm together in a cross-bloc majority to close the Sweden Democrats out there. Of course, the pan of both parties had it anchored in their respective party lines. And of course there is the same plan at the national level. Social Conservatives, a totalitarian party.

One-party democracy and buried

Love for one’s own power and privileges by far trumps respect for voters and for democracy. We are not dumber than we understand. Clearer voter disdain can not be demonstrated. No price is too high for you to avoid complying with the popular will. You are even willing to form a one-party state and bury democracy.

What should it say on the gravestone? How about this:

“Here lies Sweden’s democracy as we drove over countless times and finally managed to kill off in September 2010. Infinitely mourned and missed by the people of Sweden. ”

But before you order the gravestone, Fred, I think you should ask yourself in the mirror. See yourself in the face. Look deep into your dark brown eyes and ask yourself if you can live with more betrayal. It is not just the voters who have a choice. You have also. Think again! Remap the course! Start working for the best of Sweden and the Swedish people’s best! It probably will feel strange at first, but I assure you that it is worth it. You will feel much better. You think it might not, but I want your very best.

Translated by Ralph Haglund

 

Your affectionate Julia....

Julia Caesar in English: Welcome to Pretend Land.

Welcome to Pretend Land!

© Julia Cæsar

[The  link is to the Swedish original - most of the links are to Swedish articles.]

Let’s take a tour of the country where nothing is what it appears to be, where there is a virtue in pretending and verging on criminal to tell the truth. Pretending is an euphemism for lying, but for the sake of fragile souls we call it to pretend. In The Pretend Land the overall transfer process has now reached such proportions that many have begun to doubt their sanity. They’ve actually started to believe more in what authorities (media, politicians, the head at work) say than on what they see with their own eyes. Since Authorities (media, politicians, the head at work) with their joint efforts have made every effort to demonize and destroy, those who refuse to pretend now remain only a small minority of citizen who still insist on calling things their proper names. But with intensified and targeted measures we expect even this small minority to soon resign and join the crowd of the Pretenders.

The most important thing in Pretend Land is to pretend that it is superior to all other countries in all respects. No citizen may violate this basic rule. Pretend It’s Best, Most Beautiful and – above all – by far has the highest of high moral standing. It is Pretend Land that will save the world. The Pretend Land takes its responsibilities. World champions in goodness, for sure! Here, we carry our halo with pride! There is not a conflict or disaster in the world that is not an issue for Pretend Land.

The means of intervention can vary, from sending a Pretend successful aircraft to any Muslim trouble spot to the limitless solidarity to pour billions of taxpayers’ hard earned money in as far away location and maximum under-developed communities as possible. For this purpose, the Pretend Land has a specific agency, SIDA, which is crowded with Pretend People who pretend that their uninhibited giving away of other people’s money is fighting poverty in recipient countries. Unfortunately, no evidence suggests that the monetary rain has given even the slightest tangible results – except for an increase in poverty among their own plundered people. It is not included in the mission to combat this side effect.

It is the utopian qualities that are counted.

The Pretend Land we are, pretend that we are more noble than any other. Yes, we do not just pretend – we are fully confident that we hold the seal of utter nobility on our brow. The ultimate, the best and noblest is the intellectual elite who are constantly screaming out demands for the people of Pretend Land that it will take care of all of mankind. The programs of the intellectual elite are multicultural, with the bestowal of money to other countries, installation art and atonal music, but on the very first position we find “global justice and solidarity”. These issues have since 1960 the intellectual elite taken to the heart, and because the poorest and most underdeveloped countries, which by coincidence are also Muslim, has also safeguarded that Islam has ended up among the elite, or by the words of Ole Hyltoft´s “best citizen’s” agenda.

No matter what they propagate, it is always their own best interests they care about. Pretend People still define the world and themselves according to a Marxist model. While it is a somewhat outdated and bloodstained way to define nobility, it is still viable in some way. The only difference is that the Pretend Noble have replaced “the oppressed proletariat” against all the world’s ethnic groups who have a hard time, and the capitalists of all Europe’s peoples in their role as oppressors.

Special features of the many Pretenders that still suffers from the consequences of Marxist thought is that their concern for Third World population far outstrips the sympathy and the community they feel for their own countrymen. Since their own countrymen in the world of the Pretenders represent the oppressive class, it would be nothing but pure racism to identify with or benefit them. Completely unthinkable for the Pretenders. The need for an utopia to believe in is so strong that no visible trouble exists for replacing one utopia against the other. Marxism and multiculturalism is touch and go. Islamism also fits perfectly into the context. For the Pretenders, it is the totalitarian and utopian qualities that count.

An extreme immigration party poisoned with goodness

In the global elite’s goodness very top layer we distinguish large leaves are in the Green Party, which is green in the face of goodness poisoning pretend to be an ecologist, but in reality is an extreme immigration party. Great Posing makers believe it is a human right for all inhabitants of the earth to move to Pretend Land. Drunken migration agreement with the center-right alliance government recently exclaims milieu preten… – sorry environment leaves were Bodil Ceballos and Peter Rådberg following in an article in Expressen in an unbeatable goodness fit of pure orgiastic dimensions:

“Sweden can contribute to making another world possible for the Libyan population. We can make a difference. Sweden will work for the refugees from North Africa may be a safe haven in Sweden and the rest of Europe opens itself for persecuted and oppressed. As one of the world’s richest countries, it is our duty to act and provide aid to victims. (…) The EU and Sweden will actively support the movement for freedom in Libya, by providing financial and humanitarian assistance. “

When they cork up the box with organic wine

The Pretenders never bother with any deep analysis or thought. They are driven by such strong emotional pressure that they are trapped in their utopias, the more unrealistic the better. The ecologist’s statements are such amusing things that can be said if you live safety in the knowledge that you never personally have to suffer any consequences of its own totally unrealistic goodness policies. The main thing is that they can float in the pleasant state of omnipotent goodness and preserve their identity by pretending.

It is possible that some occasional ecologist at some point has suffered from the thought after violating pale at the thought that it can get quite crowded in the Prertend country’s state budget, waiting lists for accommodation and in the work queue if some one million North Africans move here. It is during such occasions they have been observed to uncork the box with organic wine, nibble on the DEMAND label cheeses from Farmer’s own farm, speak visions with like-minded and dream away in a blissful intoxication of goodness which is like honey and balm for their own self-image. Among the reader comments in the newspaper Expressen, signature Max 79 summarizes:

“Why do not we just close Sweden instead of dragging it out like this and pretend?”

Yes, why?

We pretend that immigration enriches us

In the Pretend Land we pretend that immigration enriches us. We pretend that it makes our country a more interesting country. With comprehensive blinders on and led by power Pretenders with Supreme Illusionist Grand mogul Fredrik Reinfeldt (m) at the head, we intensify the pretending before making the inevitable social and economic crash as we approach the end. The Pretend Land now receives daily experiences of the exotic excitement and enrichment in the form of a rapidly growing dependency of people in the segregated ethnic enclaves where the inhabitants continue to live as they did in their old homelands, burn cars, burn down schools, throw stones at police and rescue personnel, an increasing and brutal violence, honor and shame killings, child marriage, unaccompanied 25 years old “children” giving breathlessly exciting challenges for schools in the form of thousands of illiterate with invigorating linguistic innovations as “Svenne whore”, broken social budgets and an indigenous population that has become the exception and only has the role as funders of the galloping madness. (Graphic: Affe)

Faced with a demographic group, we actually take the biggest blinders on to have the power to pretend. It’s the old people who once with their work built up the country before it became the Pretend Land. They have not kept up with the pace, they have never learned to pretend. For them, it has always been a reality that has existed. They have difficulty understanding what is happening in their homeland. We must have patience with them, the fossils are from another time. We must forgive them for their lack of enthusiasm when they realize that the future they have to look forward to is to be locked up in their old-age homes with dirty diapers and no staff.

Thankfully, they are a silent and politically harmless group that can be cut substantially into without them complaining. Nobody is even interested in listening to how they have it or hear their stories about the country as it was before. With his shaky old man’s votes they claim that it was a good country, but it was certainly a racist country because it was ethnically homogeneous. You just have to wait for the old to die out as the anachronistic relics they are. So we have one less distraction.

Propaganda and discrimination

To get the population of the Pretend Land to submit to the art of pretending, the ruling elite has a number of infallible methods at their disposal.

Propagandistic brainwashing is proven by many totalitarian dictatorships and guaranteed effective in getting people to pretend. Politicians in Pretend Land have with great consensus decided that the country is a Pretended Multicultural Country, and its inhabitants damn duty to accept and love it. If people are reluctant, there is a whole arsenal of penalties available.<

To begin with, they call anyone who dares to express different views on mass immigration and multiculturalism compared to the state-sanctioned version, for “racists” and “xenophobic”. Guaranteed to be effective, clogging the mouth of the majority. Would some have the bad taste still to criticize the policy with factual arguments, one can use the proven methods of ostracism, isolation, degradation, or fired from work. Under the threat of losing their livelihood, most come to their senses. For employers who imagine that they themselves can decide who they may employ in his business, there is always the possibility of notification of ethnic or religious discrimination and the obligation to pay immense damages. Truly effective and a real boost for the industry.

When the lids of the coffers slam down, the mumbling rises to the sky

In The Pretend Land we pretend that we have freedom of speech. It is enshrined in the Constitution. But as everyone knows, it is dedicated to a small elite of established Pretenders who have the right views on gender, immigration, diversity, culture, and homosexuals. Inherent in the concept of pretending is that nothing of real interest to the country or public discussion can be discussed. If you do so, the entire culture of consensus, which is the corner stone of the pretensions, is likely to crack. This should not happen.

8% of the population is not considered to have anything of interest to contribute and and is not given access to the official discussion forums. The population of Pretend Land therefore becomes increasingly quieter. On the large newspaper opinion pages, it is a small clique who pretend debating with each other in a consistently predictable choreography. When the lids of the coffers one day inevitably slams close, the pretending debaters will mumble and chatter to continue rising into the sky and soar as balloons over the gravesites in perpetuity. For not even death can silence those pretense babblers and their stone dead views.

The public should know as little as possible

One of the most important and indispensable forces in the brigade of the Great Pretenders is / are journalists. As everyone knows, they do not shrink from any means to serve the public doctored and state-obedient Pretend Versions of what is going on in Pretend Land. Journalists make an assessment of what the public can take, and this assessment is based of course on the same agenda that politicians have. The public should know as little as possible, that is the best for them. The public shall not know anything about certain immigrant groups who are over-represented in crime, and it is definitely not right to get descriptions of criminals so that it can take heed and avoid unnecessary offense. To “identify” criminals are for journalists a far worse crime than to give the rapist X the opportunity to commit more rapes because the public does not know what he looks like. The ethics are purely for immigrant criminals. For natives, the norm is total exposure with name, photo and home address.

The journalists’ efforts to maintain Pretend Society cannot be underestimated. Without them, the whole Pretend Culture falls apart like a house of cards. It should be clear to us that it is in the best intentions of the journalists to protect us from the less pleasant truths about immigration policy implications, as the epidemic increase in rapes of Swedish women, committed by immigrants, the true meaning of Islam or the Pretend Land’s politicians playing behind people’s backs and shipping off an increasingly amount of national authority to the power center in Europe. Let us give a thought of pity for all those power megaphones and their mental health when they sit and sweat at their keyboards, or in radio and TV studios brooding over how they should be able to snatch up features and articles without revealing the truth about the state of Pretend Land. Imagine how it must feel to lie in return for payment, even if it is abundant.

In The Pretend Land everyone is the same

The Pretend Land pretends that we are all equal. While some in the country insist they like different, most are not strong enough to pretend that so they successfully circumvent the dilemma by pretending that everyone is equal. However, this is a dogma that has become most difficult to keep its momentum, as more and more residents in Pretend Land detect that they are not. That they are simply deceived in all their credulity. Residents can see and draw conclusions, a process that is potentially lethal to the pretend politics.

In the Pretend Land people have lived in peace for two hundred years. Until half a century ago the country was homogenous, peaceful and well developed. It was no coincidence that it was so. A country’s level of development and well-being is directly related to the average intelligence quotient, IQ of the population. The Pretend Land is now at 98. It is the same as immigrants from other parts of Europe. Immigrants from some East Asian countries have an average IQ of 105 These groups have no problem in general with their education, work and integration into a new country.

Mass Import of mentally retarded

Immigrants from the Middle East, South America, South and Southeast Asia have an average IQ of 86 Immigrants from Africa is distinguished from all other immigrant groups. They have an average IQ around 70 The threshold for mental retardation or intellectual disability is right there, at an IQ of 70 Under an IQ of 70 you are considered mentally retarded.

When Pretend Land mass import people from Africa, we thus import tens of thousands of mentally retarded individuals from communities with a level of development hundreds of years back in time compared to ours, people who come from tribal societies and in many cases are functionally illiterate. Many of the immigrants from the Middle East and Africa have also mental and physical disabilities as a result of inbreeding for many generations.

“Modern IQ tests are color blind”

Just to mention these facts provoke outcry in the priesthood of Pretenders. The entire General Dogma of the equality is threatened. It could crack and destroy the whole Pretend politics!

“But the modern IQ test is color blind” writes Professor Helmuth Nyborg in an article entitled “We can not let it go as in Sweden” in Jyllands-Posten. They take no account of skin color, culture or religion.

A full 80% of the intelligence is inherited and is not affected significantly by education or training. It is stable over generations. Studies show that immigrant groups maintain their average IQ for many generations and that it would remain essentially unaffected by their new environment. It turns out, for example, in immigrant children born in the new country that every opportunity is given to schools and education but they fail to even exit elementary school with full scores.

Have we not many different kinds of intelligence? Yes, but only one of them is really interesting, replies Professor Nyborg. It is the general intelligence, which has greater heritability and greater stability throughout life than other measurements. Based on the general intelligence, a person’s length of education, employment status and income in later life, be predicted with great accuracy. The naive belief that social engineering in the form of benevolent welfare benefits and opportunities for adult learning can compensate for low IQ and turn all the immigrants into productive citizens falls flat. African immigrants with an average IQ of 70 have serious problems in all countries they have emigrated to and end, just as other people with low IQ, with a risk of living on subventions all their lives.

Imports of low IQ lowers the GDP of the Pretend Land

By pretending that everyone is equal and giving invitation to all people without selection to Pretend Land, without imposing any requirements, the politicians consciously lowers the average IQ of the Pretend Land. It is by no means a cosmetic problem, however much effort is put in to pretend. However much we may hate it, a series of large-scale international surveys show that a country’s average IQ quite accurately predicts the country’s gross domestic product (GDP), its economic growth potential and productivity at the individual level. By unrestrained import of people from countries with low average IQ, the politics of the Pretend Land wilfully lower the country’s productivity and competitiveness in the international market. The universal welfare systems are not designed for the load of an irresponsible immigration from countries with low average IQ. The result is that it is eroded and becomes exhausted.

Immigration from countries with low average IQ also causes increased crime and more prevalent antisocial behavior. The relationship between IQ and criminality is strong. The lower the IQ the greater the risk of a criminal career.

New research shows that people with low talent more often commit crimes than others. The study, which was made on 49 000 Swedish men, 12.6% of men with poor talent were convicted to prison. The corresponding figure among the average IQ was 6.3% and among the highly gifted, 1.9%. People with low intelligence were also sentenced several times and for longer sentences.

A betrayal of future generations

Future generations of existence is at stake for the sake of a Pretend Ideology. Grand Mogul Supreme Illusionist Fredrik Reinfeldt’s words about “differences going side by side” is a cliche, a dream, an illusion. This is how it sounded when he as MUF President developed his views on welfare and benefit dependency in a TV advertising in 1993:

[Video link.]

As we know, there has come a lot of water under the country’s Pretend Bridges since 1993. Supreme Illusionist Reinfeldt has long since abandoned his own theses. He is in trouble even with his own core voters, and the moderate sympathies plummet in the polls.

“Reinfeldt has made what Gösta Bohman never would have done – he has chased away their own core voters. Presumably, Reinfeldt also created the moderate abstainer because citizens now know that there is no significance to vote for the Conservatives because you get a centralist party-environmental party gruel back. Conservatives have no charm. The Conservatives won because of a lousy opponent which can change faster than the Conservatives, Jan Kallberg writes on Today’s PS / opinion.

 

The Cultural Elite only associates with itself

Attempts to avoid conflicts between different groups of people by pretending that differences do not exist or can be fixed with a bit of social engineering is doomed to failure. Any attempt to replace ethnic, cultural and national loyalties with ideological Pretend Loyalties creates even worse conflicts. No ideology has so far managed to wipe out human nature and reprogram her to anything she is not. Instinctively, we regard strangers with suspicion and fear, to varying degrees. We protect ourselves against the potentially dangerous until otherwise is proven. All ethnic and social groups prefer to spend time with their peers. This is particularly true for the cultural elite of the Pretend Left wing elite that is as closed and inward-looking as any secret societies at any time. The dream of a pluralism in which people of different ethnicity, culture and religion live together in harmony is great – a dream.

“A society is a contract between its members”

“A society is a contract between its members,” writes Professor Byron M. Roth in “The Perils of Diversity” – the Immigration and Human Nature “, summarized in the Norwegian blog Honest Thinking.

He cites the Irish-British philosopher Edmund Burke (1729-1797):

“A society is a partnership in all science, all art, every virtue and in all perfection. Since such a partnership takes several generations to accomplish, it is a partnership not only between the living but also between them and those who are dead and those who will be born. “

To do like the country’s elite does, to pretend to ignore their obligations to future generations is to betray one of society’s basic principles and prepare for disasters.

No difference between men and women

The Pretend Land does not even see any difference between men and women, so it is a pure miracle that there can be any children. And IF there would be no difference between the sexes, the society is by far not biological in nature but the result of social indoctrination. Everything else is prejudice and chauvinism. The basis of this pretending is a derailed equality idea that has been perverted into a Pretend Belief that all are equal. Any implied difference is perceived by the left as discriminatory and a violation of equality dogma.

To be safe, learning the full pretentions must start early, preferably as early as preschool. You must bend in time, what has to be crooked. Kids are so malleable. It was already known to the Russian Bolsheviks, who still cast their shadows over the bloody care systems for children in Pretend Land. As one of the theorists behind the revolutionary Soviet school system said:

“We must transform the youth into a generation of Communists. Children are like soft wax, they are very malleable and of those, you can create good communists. We must protect children from the pernicious influence of the family … We have to nationalize them. Very early in their young lives, they must be under the beneficent influence of what the communist schools offer … Forcing the mother to surrender her child to the Soviet state – it is our job. “(V. Zenzinov: Deserted. The Story of the Children Abandoned in Soviet Russia. London, 1931, page 27. Reproduced in Orlando Figes: “The Whisperers. Private Life in Stalin’s Russia“.)

In Egalia there are no boys and girls

In kindergarten Egalia in Stockholm, there are no boys or girls. Here we have abolished the sexes. The gender-typing words are not used. Instead of he or she, a child is called “hen”.

“We do not conceal that there are different genders. But a child should not be placed in a compartment on the basis of their biological sex, “says Gabriella Martinson, Director, in Aftonbladet.

“The difference is that this is gender equality and our basic education principle.”

Traditional children’s books are rejected. The goal is to offer diversity.

“We like to choose books with single parents or same-sex parents. Hetero Family books they will still see everywhere. It may seem exaggerated, but we must always be a counterweight to a gender-segregated and conservative society. “

“The Lucia celebration we actually rewrote the well-known “Confectioner “. “He” became “hen”.

Why is it so important?

“Because there is always a he. He is the norm and the start of the children singing. Every cow and squirrel is a he, unless otherwise stated. And when a thing is normalized, then it is something that is abnormal,“ said Gabriella Martinson.

All rag dolls are dark-skinned and exactly the same – except for one detail: the genitals. They are – lo and behold – different. Possibly the staff realized that the kids still would eventually discover that they are different.

Children as agents of ideological goals

In kindergarten Egalia the children are used as a means of achieving adult ideological cheating. Children can not defend themselves, they are fully exposed. To help to early indoctrinate children into sexless Pretend Creatures, one can find books by Anette Skåhlberg and Cathy Dahlquist who also use children as a means of ideological goals and have a gay agenda, “Jösta and John“, “Donald with a dress” and “Who can love Ella? “.

“Charlie with a dress” is sold out. There is apparently an insatiable need for literature about little boys who want to go dressed in a dress. Jösta and John are two gay giraffes. They would be so very happy to have children, but they can not get because they are like and like.

“Now that time has come to settle down,
The two wonders, whereto live – is there more?
Is it just us, then it’s over?
Where are those wonderful little child cries?
For it is true that they both want children.
Though they are of the same variety, like and like. “

Luckily the gay giraffes find an egg from which is hatched a crocodile that immediately exclaims, “Dad!” at the sight of them.

A 91-year-old hobo and the “equal value of everyone”

In the same author’s book “Who can love Ella?” the propaganda megaphones are turned on at full blast. In the Pretend Land all have equal value. A vagrant who has proven unable to take care of herself is portrayed as by a miracle capable of taking care of a small child. Ella is an abandoned baby found in a stairwell of the 91-year-old (!) bag lady Elvira, sleeping in tents and stairwells. By day, she drags around the streets and begs with everything she owns in cages stacked in a stroller. This life is presented as appropriate to be dragged around in for a little child.

“Ella whimpers in her arms. She is soaked with pee and needs an exchange. Elvira makes diapers of old rags, dish rags and plastic bags. Her sports bottle she makes into a baby bottle and fills it with warm milk. “

Homeless people will never become 91 years old. Because of their hard living, they are rarely more than than 50. When the homeless person dies, Ella goes around with a sign on herself that says “Who can love Ella?” A couple of gay men take care of her. In these propaganda books there are no limits to the imagination. The authors’ view is to all costs to prove their thesis that all humans are equal. This value does not include the value of the child. There is no child’s perspective. It deals only with the needs of adults. Defenseless children should be pumped full of politically correct lies that their parents and other adults need to maintain their Pretend World.

A censored Negro king

Children are the perfect target group for pretending adults. When I was a child and read Astrid Lindgren’s books about Pippi Longstocking, I was not disturbed about Pippi Longstocking’s father Efraim who was a Negro king of Kurrekurredutt Island in the South Pacific. I read about the little black Sambo also, without damage. And I loved Ake Holmberg’s books about the private detective Ture who can not say ”s”.

That was then. Like that it can obviously not be allowed to continue in Pretend Land. Pippi Longstocking’s father is not a Negro king anymore. He is “Ruler of the kurrekurredutts”. Publisher Rabén & Sjögren, who have earned countless millions on Astrid Lindgren’s books, have corrected the author’s original text to make it fit in Pretend Land. The same publisher has withdrawn the proposed new edition by Åke Holmberg’s (1907-1991) book “Ture in Paris” from 1953. It contains the word “Negro”.

The publisher wanted to change the word “Negro” to something more fitting like “colored” or “black”, but the Swedish Writers’ Union was honorable enough to say no to alter the original text.

“We have given out the Ture Sventon Books several times over the years, but thought it was time to edit out the word that feels antiquated and negatively charged. When it was not possible, we choose not to redistribute Ture in Paris, “says Cecilia Nilson, publishing director at Rabén & Sjögren.

It is called history revision when you change the past to fit in a modern Pretend ideology. When will we see Astrid Lindgren’s beloved naughty boy Emil as black with sister Ida in a niqab? (See Affes montage earlier in the text.)

“Everyone’s equal value is an ideological fantasy”

Karl-Olov Arnstberg, a retired professor of ethnology, writing on Merit Wager’s blog:

“Basis of Values, “Värdegrund” (the Swedish Wikipedia) is a concept that crept in through the back door of the political landscape. t is legitimate to victimize the person or persons who do not have the correct set of values. Värdegrund, in other words, is a concept that opposes the right to think and think freely. Sure, think whatever you want, but you will not play on our farm. If you do not have the right Värdegrund we will not hire you, and do not use your services.

If we from this proceed to the question of equal value, so it is a rhetorical phrase that sounds good but does not have any connection with reality. People have never been equally worth, not in today’s Sweden and not in yesterday’s, nor anywhere else. They will never ever be so there. People are different, but pretend it is not so. The philosopher Slavoj Žižek denotes “equal value” as an ideological fantasy. The term has no political representation, but acts only as a sorting tool. “

The truth has always been ill seen

The truth has always been ill-seen and commands a high price for those who have dared to express it. Jesus was sentenced to death and crucified. Sokrates (about 470-399 BC) was forced to drain the poisoned cup, accused of having seduced the youth and denies the gods. The philosopher and priest Giordano Bruno (1548-1600) was held captive for eight years and then burned at the stake as a heretic in Rome since he contends that the universe is infinite and that the sun and not the earth is the centre of our solar system. Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) and Bruno were convinced it was the sun and not the earth is the centre of our solar system. He was 1633 before the inquisition court and forced to renounce it “false doctrine”. The punishment was more lenient than Bruno’s. Galileo was sentenced to house arrest for the rest of his life.

I live with a growing sense of unreality in Pretend Land. I do not think I’m alone. I am one of those who have had the good fortune to grow up and live in a country that was well before it became a Pretend Land. I mourn something vital and infinitely valuable has been lost – the country that is mine and many others.

And I mourn the truth.

 

By Julia Caesar

Other Swedish articles by Julia Caesar you find here. A Google translation is not too hard to comprehend.

Blogg: MXp: Massinvandringen kostar inte bara 80 miljarder kronor för år 2010

 

http://ekuriren.se/ledareasikter/insandare/1.1047703-oarlig-och-osaklig-debatt

 

......


Julia Caesar in English: The silent minister

Original in Swedish: http://snaphanen.dk/2011/01/09/s%C3%B8ndagskronik-den-tigande-ministern/

Latest update: 9/1-11 KL. 0139 18

By Julia Caesar

Copyright Julia Caesar, Snaphanen, HRS and document.no. You are welcome to copy parts of the text but observe good blog behavior and link to Snaphanen, the link at the top!

Four weeks have passed since the suicide bomber Taimour Abdulwahab, 29, blew himself up in the middle of Christmas shopping in Stockholm. According to Zia Alkanani, head of Iraq’s anti-terror agency, the TV channel al-Arabiya, Abdulwahab was trained in jihad in the Iraqi city of Mosul during the three months before the terrorist attack.

The data are consistent with the message that Abdulwahab himself left behind in a sound file. He asks his family for forgiveness because he had lied. He had not traveled to the Middle East because of work. The cause was training as suicide bomber. Taimour Abdulwahab’s intention was to take as many innocents as possible with him in death.

Swedish Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt (m) took 19 hours before he said a single word about the terrorist attack to the Swedish people. And when he opened his mouth, then came – nothing more than empty platitudes.

“What has happened is undesirable and unacceptable,” said Reinfeldt. Real powerful words in a national emergency. Then he called the terrorist attack “unacceptable, as Sweden is an open society” and spoke of “safeguarding the Swedish transparency and have patience with democracy.”

Twelve days of silence

Twelve days have passed since four Swedish nationals and asylum seekers in Denmark were arrested on suspicion of advanced plans for a massacre against the Jyllands-Posten in Copenhagen:

• Mounir Dhahri, 44-year-old native of Tunisia.

• Omar Abdalla Aboelazm, 30-year-old Lebanese with Swedish citizenship

• A Salman, 26-year-old Iraqi, asylum seeker in Denmark.

• Munir Awad, 29-year-old from Lebanon with Swedish citizenship.

In Sweden was  Sahbi Zalouti Ben Mohamed, 37, arrested, registered for census purposes in Järfälla. Tunisian with Swedish citizenship. Fredrik Reinfeldt is silent. Twelve days of silence. His silence roars like thunder in the sky. It eats into our minds, the harsh vacuum of us – just in the inner room where the security and confidence have their abode. We nine and a half million Swedish citizens are left to ourselves with our questions and our concerns. The person whose responsibility it is to explain what is happening to our country, the one whose job it is to take our fears seriously, is silent.

The place where there sould be a mature and responsible leader is echoing empty.

The position as Father of the nation is vacant.

A 27-year “unaccompanied refugee child”

A few days into the new year the “unaccompanied refugee child” Abudala Karim was apprehended in Uganda on suspicion of belonging to the Somali terrorist group Al-Shabaab. He was assumed to be on his way to Kampala to perform a suicide bombing. The man lives in Sundsvall. In his pocket he has a two month old Swedish alien’s passport, plus a Kenyan passport. The Kenyan passport shows that the man is from Kenya and was born in 1983, thus 27 years old – not born in 1992 and from Somalia that he has cheated about to the Swedish authorities. He has brought himself into Sweden on false premises, large tears rolling in force as an “unaccompanied refugee child” has been applied and a permanent residence permit, PUT, was granted without any unnecessary issues raised.

The blog world is as usual the first to report on the arrest, including the Merit Wager’s blog and Politically Incorrect.

Bosnian war criminals

Around the same time 42-year-old Mirsad Mesanovic was arrested at Kastrup Airport, Bosnian with Swedish citizenship, on suspicion of murder during the Balkan War 1991.

Mesanovic is since 2007 the subject of a Slovenian arrest warrant for war crimes. But Swedish prosecutors has redefined the crime as manslaughter, which means that it cannot be prosecuted any longer. He lives in Åhus in Skåne, is married and has two children, sports coach, local politician on the Left and juror.

In court is a different war criminal, Ahmet Makitan, 44, charged with aggravated breach of international law, murder, kidnapping and torture. He was a school janitor in Sollefteå until his secret was revealed. During the civil wars in the Balkans in 1992 Ahmet Makitan served as camp guard at concentration camp Dretelj in Bosnia-Herzegovina. He is the first war criminal who has been arrested in Sweden and put on trial.

It is a beautiful little collection, products of the unprecedentedly lax asylum policies of Sweden. Sweden is a lawless country. The Immigration Act does not apply. The Swedish handling of asylum cases and other immigration exposes Swedish citizens’ lives to risk. And not just us. They are now detained Islamists, brought to a safe haven in Sweden who had intended to slaughter the entire Jyllands-Posten’s editorial board. Swedish immigration policy is not only an issue for Sweden. It also exposes people to our neighbors in grave danger. How long will they put up with that?

And Fredrik Reinfeldt shuts up.

The Prime Minister’s responsibility

Ultimately, this is Fredrik Reinfeldt’s responsibility. He has long been sailing on a prawn sandwich, with a working line as sails and boasted that he and Finance Minister Anders Borg have led Sweden through the financial crisis. Beautifully so. But underneath there are much larger structural problems to deal with, problems that are in the process of deleting Sweden as a welfare nation. The large, never acknowledged leak in the Swedish economy is the costs of the immigration policy. And now it is clear what many of us have suspected a long time: that thanks to our “goodness” and “humanity” we have within our country’s borders around a thousand war criminals, and an unknown number of Islamist terrorists (200 acording to SÄPO, the Security Police), who are both capable and seriously want to damage Sweden and Swedes, plus other Nordic countries in the name of Islam.

And Fredrik Reinfeldt shuts up. Never has a silence rumbled so loud. The unspoken words sound like trumpets.

But what should the prime minister say? Regardless of the political basis it is possible to understand his difficulties. He can not very well blame the Socialists, although they probably were the ones who ruled Sweden when the suspected terrorists sought asylum and generously were granted both permanent residence and Swedish citizenship. He knows that in the case of the irresponsible immigration policy, he and the Alliance are  just the same birds of a feather as the other old parliamentary parties. Yes worse!

New asylum records year after year

It is a fact that the number of asylum applications and the number of new residence permits granted in Sweden has broken new records year after year ever since the center-right alliance government came to power in 2006 In 2010, it was a record again. According to the Migration Board’s preliminary statistics 31 901 persons applied for asylum in Sweden compared with 24 232 in 2009. An increase of over 30%. The so-called “unaccompanied refugee children”, that is, the bearded young men who often lie to get a quick path into the country and represent the vanguard for their large families, increased from 2250 in 2009 to 2394. At the same time the corresponding figures have drastically decreased in the other Nordic countries.

Fredrik Reinfeldt can not say that he is unaware that an unknown number of terrorists and war criminals slip by in the handling of the lawless raffle which is Swedish asylum policy. If so he is both lying and seems to be remarkably stupid. So what should Fredrik Reinfeldt really say? It is not easy to know. His dilemma is that once he opens his mouth, out jump the frogs that seeks its equal in stupidity, hatred of the Swedes and contempt in judgment.

We Swedes do not exist

Some examples – the parade is getting quite long by now. It was extremely unfortunate, just a few months after his election victory in 2006 when the Prime Minister visited immigrant dense suburb Ronna in Södertälje:

“Old Swedish is only barbarism. The rest of the development has come from the outside. “(14 November 2006.)

Booom! There we Swedes got it in the face, so we kept quiet. Barbarians are what we are. It is the immigrants who have been responsible for Sweden’s development, not us.

After the beating of 24-year-old SD politician David von Arnold in Malmö in the election campaign in 2010:

“I would like to point out that those who live on running up an “us-and-them” mentality and a fundamentally hateful way of looking at relationships between people should not be surprised if that happens.”

If you get beaten because you are politician you can thus blame yourself. At least if you are Sverigedemokrat.

An unmatched record is the Prime Minister’s statements in a debate in the Riksdag on 9 December 2010 with the Sweden Democrats’ leader Jimmie Åkesson.

Åkesson requires that the law on hate speech also applies to Swedes in the situations where the Swedish origin of the population is in minority and violated, for example in schools or workplaces. Pay particular attention to Mona Sahlin’s (s), mocking faces in the background when Jimmie Åkesson makes his question. It is two days before the suicide attack in Stockholm City, but no one knows on this particular day. Fredrik Reinfeldt says:

“That there is a group that could be defined as the Swedes, and I understand that there is great interest in Sweden Democrats to keep coming back to the formulation, turns out very often be difficult to define. There are so many who feel Swedish and suddenly being told that they are not. It will be strange if you try to define it. ”

Bad luck, when he manifests itself?

Either Fredrik Reinfeldt is totally clueless. Or perhaps he has a plain improbable bad luck when he manifests itself. I’m leaning towards the former. In Reinfeldt’s brain, there is simply no such thing as Swedes, even less pure Swedes. For him, everyone who has happened to set foot on Swedish soil is a Swede, a view he also shares with most of the press corps. He has such a bad perception of reality that he does not understand what tremendous violation it  is towards the original population of Sweden when he repeatedly cast out these misguided statements. It is bad, very bad.

Many of his statements show an arrogance, moodiness and need for prestige, which ultimately seems to stem from an insecurity and immaturity. Fredrik Reinfeldt’s costume is definitely too big, and it will be long before he grows into it.

And Fredrik Reinfeldt shuts up. Perhaps he has “winter vacation”, what we usually call the Christmas holiday. But terrorism has not taken Christmas holiday. It lives around the clock, year round, and it wants to destroy us.

“We will leave no stone unturned”

On the debate site Newsmill, Eduardo Grutzky, Argentine-jew refugee and former youth leader of the suicide bomber Taimour Abdulwahab, writes:

“The current political situation in Sweden will provide the high season for all sorts of reactionaries, who claim to be able to stop young men from becoming terrorists. Society’s response should be the opposite: instead of the Prime Minister’s words that the suicide bomb was “undesirable”, the message should be that “we will turn over every stone”.

Eduardo Grutzky rejects the Swedish method to try to appease the Islamists,  the misconception that if we are good to them, they will be kind to us. That kind of logic is completely unknown in Islam.

“Those who govern Sweden now grope for measures to appease the Islamists, so they in turn can affect the” too radical “and violent Islamists. Concessions to a violent and destructive power was tested as we know, before the Second World War. The result was not satisfactory. Hitler interpreted every concession as a sign of weakness and managed during a crucial period to build up their strength and eventually almost destroy the well-intentioned nations  who at all costs had been trying to avoid a conflict. When those in power are afraid, they want to negotiate and avoid conflict. ”

This should Fredrik Reinfeldt have told the Swedish people

I’ll give Fredrik Reinfeldt  further suggestions. This he should say to the Swedish people:

“I ask the Swedish people unreservedly for an apology for the concern and the damage that I and my government has done to you by misguided immigration policies. The consequences we can see now, and they are not unexpected. In our attempt to be nicer and more generous than any other country, we have completely lost contact with the ground and allowed the development to run off at an unsustainable way. For decades we have  released the terrorists, war criminals, fanatical Islamists, rapists, murderers and other people of whose identity we do not have a clue, and they are completely out of control now. We just have not bothered to ensure that the Immigration Service follows the Aliens Act because we are so incredibly terrified of being called “racists” or “xenophobic”. It has been and is far more important for us to demonize the Sweden Democrats as much as possible and by all means make sure that they do not get any political influence, although they have 20 seats in parliament, than to conduct a responsible immigration policy. It has also been more important for us to get a pure Islamist, Abdirisak Waberi, in parliament than to open ourselves to cooperation with the Sweden Democrats. Prestige considerations is always the heaviest.

“I regret it deeply and am devastated”

All of this I regret deeply. Yes, I am devastated. I have not understood the seriousness until the explosion on Bryggargatan, and barely even then. I have tried to be a multicultural Prime Minister to appease all immigrants. But something went wrong, I understand now. From now on, I and my alliance mates will radically tighten asylum and immigration policy. We will only grant asylum under the Geneva Convention, that is to say to people who really have grounds for asylum. We will be committed to tackling all forms of Islamization of Sweden. We agree that a totalitarian, violent and oppressive ideology of women from the 600′s is out of place in Sweden, and we will not spare any means to show it in action. All Islamic schools will be closed, all claims for special treatment of Muslims will be rejected and we will immediately raise the return premiums substantially for those who prove themselves impossible to integrate into Swedish society. Furthermore, we will invest significantly in the elimination of the Swedish shameful European Championships in rape by forceful action against sexual violence and other violent crime. Immigrants who commit crimes should be deported, and we will make a legislative change so that removal is possible even if you have had time to get a Swedish citizenship.

We, the moderates want Sweden to be a safe and open country to live in. Up to now we have not  given any indication of putting that into action. We have sailed calmly and chuckled delightedly about the people who rest content with pin-money in the form of earned income tax credits, there has been enough that you should vote for us. But we have our scouts out there on the web and the blogosphere, and we are starting to realize that there discontent is growing to a popular rage against our policy, despite the earned income tax credit.

If nothing else, we recognize the gravity now that terrorism has come to Sweden. Again, I ask without reservation Swedish people for an apology. The damage I have done is immeasurable, but I want to do everything possible to atone for it ”

Reality always have time to catch up

Such a statement we will of course never hear from the Prime Minister’s lips. Fredrik Reinfeldt is afraid. Anyone who has too big a costume knows it. A prime minister may have deficiencies. He can be cocky (as Goran Persson), great wisecrack and manipulative (as Olof Palme), autocratic (as Nicolas Sarkozy) or mixed buffalo and womanizer (as Silvio Berlusconi). He can live in bigamy, as Per Albin Hansson (s, 1885-1946). But one thing a prime minister may never be:  a cowardly weakling. A prime minister must have the backbone. He must have courage and integrity and be humble enough to change his mind when he chose the wrong course.

He must never betray his people. Ever. This Fredrik Reinfeldt has made, again and again. He has no reason to feel calm one minute. Reality always has time to catch up. When voters are no longer satisfied with an earned income tax credit but are beginning to ask awkward questions about Islamic terrorism, rape championships and other consequences of mass immigration, the moment of truth is there for the Alliance government and Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt. The nightmare has only just begun.

By Julia Caesar

Translated by Ralph Haglund

Earlier chronicles (in Swedish) by the same author

  ......